Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013 Aug;19(8):556-65. doi: 10.1111/cns.12127. Epub 2013 May 27.
Rapid triage and decision-making in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) present challenging dilemma in "resource poor" environments such as the battlefield and developing areas of the world. There is an urgent need for additional tools to guide treatment of TBI. The aim of this review is to establish the possible use of diagnostic TBI biomarkers in (1) identifying diffuse and focal brain injury and (2) assess their potential for determining outcome, intracranial pressure (ICP), and responses to therapy. At present, there is insufficient literature to support a role for diagnostic biomarkers in distinguishing focal and diffuse injury or for accurate determination of raised ICP. Presently, neurofilament (NF), S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) seemed to have the best potential as diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing focal and diffuse injury, whereas C-tau, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100β, GFAP, and spectrin breakdown products (SBDPs) appear to be candidates for ICP reflective biomarkers. With the combinations of different pathophysiology related to each biomarker, a multibiomarker analysis seems to be effective and would likely increase diagnostic accuracy. There is limited research focusing on the differential diagnostic properties of biomarkers in TBI. This fact warrants the need for greater efforts to innovate sensitive and reliable biomarkers. We advocate awareness and inclusion of the differentiation of injury type and ICP elevation in further studies with brain injury biomarkers.
在“资源匮乏”的环境中,如战场和世界发展中地区,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的快速分诊和决策带来了具有挑战性的困境。迫切需要额外的工具来指导 TBI 的治疗。本综述的目的是确定诊断性 TBI 生物标志物在以下方面的可能用途:(1)识别弥漫性和局灶性脑损伤;(2)评估其在确定结果、颅内压(ICP)和对治疗反应方面的潜在作用。目前,文献不足以支持诊断性生物标志物在区分局灶性和弥漫性损伤或准确确定升高的 ICP 方面的作用。目前,神经丝(NF)、S100β、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素羧基末端水解酶-L1(UCH-L1)似乎最有潜力作为区分局灶性和弥漫性损伤的诊断性生物标志物,而 C-tau、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、S100β、GFAP 和血影蛋白裂解产物(SBDPs)似乎是 ICP 反射性生物标志物的候选者。随着与每个生物标志物相关的不同病理生理学的组合,多生物标志物分析似乎是有效的,并且可能会提高诊断准确性。关于生物标志物在 TBI 中的差异诊断特性的研究有限。这一事实需要加大创新敏感和可靠生物标志物的力度。我们主张在脑损伤生物标志物的进一步研究中,提高对损伤类型和 ICP 升高的鉴别能力的认识并将其纳入其中。