• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

S100B、GFAP、UCH-L1 和 NSE 作为轻度创伤性脑损伤后 CT 成像异常的预测因子:诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

National Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1171-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z
PMID:34709508
Abstract

Biomarkers such as calcium channel binding protein S100 subunit beta (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) have been proposed to aid in screening patients presenting with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). As such, we aimed to characterise their accuracy at various thresholds. MEDLINE, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched, and articles reporting the diagnostic performance of included biomarkers were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-II criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of biomarkers for imaging abnormalities on CT. A total of 2939 citations were identified, and 38 studies were included. Thirty-two studies reported data for S100B. At its conventional threshold of 0.1 μg/L, S100B had a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95%CI 87-94) and a specificity of 30% (95%CI 26-34). The optimal threshold for S100B was 0.72 μg/L, with a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 50-72) and a specificity of 69% (95% CI 64-74). Nine studies reported data for GFAP. The optimal threshold for GFAP was 626 pg/mL, at which the sensitivity was 71% (95%CI 41-91) and specificity was 71% (95%CI 43-90). Sensitivity of GFAP was maximised at a threshold of 22 pg/mL, which had a sensitivity of 93% (95%CI 73-99) and a specificity of 36% (95%CI 12-68%). Three studies reported data for NSE and two studies for UCH-L1, which precluded meta-analysis. There is evidence to support the use of S100B as a screening tool in mild TBI, and potential advantages to the use of GFAP, which requires further investigation.

摘要

生物标志物,如钙通道结合蛋白 S100 亚基β(S100B)、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、泛素 C 端水解酶 L1(UCH-L1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),已被提议用于辅助筛选出现轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的患者。因此,我们旨在确定这些标志物在不同阈值下的准确性。我们检索了 MEDLINE、SCOPUS 和 EMBASE,并纳入了报告包括标志物在内的诊断性能的文章。使用 QUADAS-II 标准评估偏倚风险。进行了荟萃分析以评估生物标志物对 CT 成像异常的预测价值。共识别出 2939 条引文,纳入了 38 项研究。32 项研究报告了 S100B 的数据。在其传统的 0.1μg/L 阈值下,S100B 的合并敏感性为 91%(95%CI 87-94),特异性为 30%(95%CI 26-34)。S100B 的最佳阈值为 0.72μg/L,其敏感性为 61%(95%CI 50-72),特异性为 69%(95%CI 64-74)。9 项研究报告了 GFAP 的数据。GFAP 的最佳阈值为 626pg/mL,此时敏感性为 71%(95%CI 41-91),特异性为 71%(95%CI 43-90)。在阈值为 22pg/mL 时,GFAP 的敏感性最高,为 93%(95%CI 73-99),特异性为 36%(95%CI 12-68%)。有 3 项研究报告了 NSE 的数据,有 2 项研究报告了 UCH-L1 的数据,因此无法进行荟萃分析。有证据支持 S100B 作为轻度 TBI 的筛查工具,而 GFAP 也有潜在的优势,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.S100B、GFAP、UCH-L1 和 NSE 作为轻度创伤性脑损伤后 CT 成像异常的预测因子:诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1171-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Can serum biomarkers be used to rule out significant intracranial pathology in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury? A Systemic Review & Meta-Analysis.血清生物标志物能否用于排除急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的严重颅内病变?系统评价与荟萃分析。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
3
Prognostic Value of Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血液中蛋白质生物标志物在创伤性脑损伤中的预后价值:一项动态系统评价和荟萃分析
J Neurotrauma. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0620.
4
Diagnostic Utility of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Beyond 12 Hours After Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.胶质纤维酸性蛋白在创伤性脑损伤后 12 小时以上的诊断效用:TRACK-TBI 研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jun;41(11-12):1353-1363. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0186. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein vs. S100 calcium binding protein B as blood biomarkers in observational studies of patients with mild or moderate acute traumatic brain injury.在轻度或中度急性创伤性脑损伤患者的观察性研究中,对胶质纤维酸性蛋白与S100钙结合蛋白B作为血液生物标志物的诊断准确性进行系统评价和累积Meta分析。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jul 1;9(1):18-27. doi: 10.1515/dx-2021-0006.
7
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
9
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
10
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-synthesis of rehabilitation experiences and needs of adolescent patients with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤青少年患者康复经历与需求的元整合研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1618811. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1618811. eCollection 2025.
2
Prognostic Utility of Arterial Spin Labeling in Traumatic Brain Injury: From Pathophysiology to Precision Imaging.动脉自旋标记在创伤性脑损伤中的预后效用:从病理生理学到精准成像
NeuroSci. 2025 Aug 4;6(3):73. doi: 10.3390/neurosci6030073.
3
Current Perspectives on Rehabilitation Following Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Permeability of the Blood-Brain Barrier after Traumatic Brain Injury: Radiological Considerations.颅脑创伤后血脑屏障通透性:放射学考虑。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Jan;39(1-2):20-34. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7545. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review.创伤性脑损伤中的生物流体生物标志物:系统范围综述。
心脏骤停后自主循环恢复后康复治疗的当前观点:一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151865.
4
The Value of Netrin-1 and Neuron Specific Enolase biomarkers in neonates with Hypoxic İschemic Encephalopathy.Netrin-1和神经元特异性烯醇化酶生物标志物在新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病中的价值。
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Mar 27;12:30502225251321025. doi: 10.1177/30502225251321025. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: narrative review and future prospects in neurointensive care.创伤性脑损伤的生物标志物:叙述性综述及神经重症监护的未来前景
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1539159. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1539159. eCollection 2025.
6
Prediction of outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke using serum UCH-L1, S100β, and NSE: a multicenter prospective cohort study employing machine learning methods.利用血清泛素羧基末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1)、S100β蛋白和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后的预后:一项采用机器学习方法的多中心前瞻性队列研究
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jun 10;18:17562864251342429. doi: 10.1177/17562864251342429. eCollection 2025.
7
Traumatic Brain Injury and Artificial Intelligence: Shaping the Future of Neurorehabilitation-A Review.创伤性脑损伤与人工智能:塑造神经康复的未来——综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;15(3):424. doi: 10.3390/life15030424.
8
Investigation of the Acute Effects of Two Different Preoxygenation Methods on Neurodegenerative Biomarkers in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery.两种不同预充氧方法对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者神经退行性生物标志物急性影响的研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 21;61(2):167. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020167.
9
Diagnostic performance of S100B assay for intracranial hemorrhage detection in patients with mild traumatic brain injury under antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.S100B检测在接受抗血小板或抗凝治疗的轻度创伤性脑损伤患者中检测颅内出血的诊断性能。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 17;15(1):5741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89927-9.
10
Genetic and peripheral biomarkers of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍与创伤性脑损伤共病的遗传和外周生物标志物:一项系统综述。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1500667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1500667. eCollection 2025.
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Oct;35(2):559-572. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
In the Extraordinary Times of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Clinical Strategies for Performing Spinal Surgery.2019年冠状病毒病特殊时期:脊柱手术的临床策略
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):721-729. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0306. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.即时检测平台对神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白与 S100 钙结合蛋白 B 进行血液生物标志物检测,以预测创伤性脑损伤:创伤性脑损伤研究中的转化研究和临床知识。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Dec 1;37(23):2460-2467. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7140. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study.急性创伤性脑损伤入院时的血液生物标志物:与 CENTER-TBI 研究中的严重程度、CT 表现和治疗路径的关系。
EBioMedicine. 2020 Jun;56:102785. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102785. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments.风险偏倚可视化 (robvis):一个用于可视化风险偏倚评估的 R 包和 Shiny 网络应用程序。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
S100B outperforms clinical decision rules for the identification of intracranial injury on head CT scan after mild traumatic brain injury.S100B 在轻度外伤性脑损伤后头部 CT 扫描识别颅内损伤方面优于临床决策规则。
Brain Inj. 2020 Feb 23;34(3):407-414. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1725123. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
NRGN, S100B and GFAP levels are significantly increased in patients with structural lesions resulting from mild traumatic brain injuries.在轻度创伤性脑损伤导致结构性损伤的患者中,神经调节蛋白(NRGN)、S100B蛋白和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平显著升高。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;183:105380. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105380. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Prospective Validation of the Scandinavian Guidelines for Initial Management of Minimal, Mild, and Moderate Head Injuries in Adults.《斯堪的纳维亚成人轻微、轻度和中度头部损伤初始处理指南的前瞻性验证》
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Oct 15;36(20):2904-2912. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6351. Epub 2019 Jul 10.