Wongsripuemtet Pattrapun, Ohnuma Tetsu, Temkin Nancy, Barber Jason, Komisarow Jordan, Manley Geoffrey T, Hatfield Jordan, Treggiari Miriam, Colton Katharine, Sasannejad Cina, Chaikittisilpa Nophanan, Grandhi Ramesh, Laskowitz Daniel T, Mathew Joseph P, Hernandez Adrian, James Michael L, Raghunathan Karthik, Miller Joseph B, Vavilala Monica S, Goldstein Ben, Krishnamoorthy Vijay
Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Program, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jun 29:17511437251349680. doi: 10.1177/17511437251349680.
Beta-blockers have been studied for potential benefits in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the association between early beta-blocker exposure and brain injury biomarkers following moderate-severe TBI.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Patients ⩾ 17 years with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Early beta-blocker exposure was defined as administration within the first 72 h of admission. The primary outcome was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3 post-injury. Biomarkers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP). Propensity-weighted models analyzed the association between beta-blocker exposure and biomarker levels.
Among 450 patients, 31 (7%) received beta-blockers (BB+). The mean (SD) age of BB+ patients was 51.4 (16.2) years, compared to 39.5 (17.0) years for unexposed patients (BB-). BB+ group was associated with a decreased NSE level on day 3 (ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96, = 0.026), although this was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons ( = 0.13). For secondary outcomes, UCH-L1 levels increased on day 5 in the BB+ group (ratio = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12- 2.36, = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment ( = 0.55). The NSE level on day 14 decreased in the BB+ group (ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.66, < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment ( = 0.005).
There was no association between early beta-blocker exposure and the primary outcome which was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3. In exploratory analysis, we found that early beta-blocker may associated with decreased NSE level on day 14. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of propensity-weighted analysis to identify associations, direct clinical practice changes cannot be recommended. However, the significant association with NSE level warrants further investigation through prospective studies or randomized controlled trials to confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of early beta-blocker exposure on neuronal cellular injury.
β受体阻滞剂已被研究用于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的潜在益处。本研究旨在调查中度至重度TBI后早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与脑损伤生物标志物之间的关联。
我们使用创伤性脑损伤转化临床研究与知识(TRACK-TBI)研究的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入入住重症监护病房(ICU)的年龄≥17岁、中度至重度TBI(格拉斯哥昏迷量表3-12分)患者。早期β受体阻滞剂暴露定义为入院后72小时内给药。主要结局是伤后第3天基于血液的脑损伤生物标志物水平。生物标志物包括胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、泛素C末端水解酶-L1(UCH-L1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、S100钙结合蛋白B(S100B)以及炎症生物标志物C反应蛋白(CRP)。倾向加权模型分析了β受体阻滞剂暴露与生物标志物水平之间的关联。
在450例患者中,31例(7%)接受了β受体阻滞剂(BB+)。BB+组患者的平均(标准差)年龄为51.4(16.2)岁,未暴露患者(BB-)为39.5(17.0)岁。BB+组与伤后第3天NSE水平降低相关(比值=0.71,95%置信区间0.52-0.96,P=0.026),尽管在进行多重比较调整后这一差异无统计学意义(P=0.13)。对于次要结局,BB+组伤后第5天UCH-L1水平升高(比值=1.62,95%置信区间1.12-2.36,P=0.011),但调整后差异无统计学意义(P=0.55)。BB+组伤后第14天NSE水平降低(比值0.45,95%置信区间0.30-0.66,P<0.001),调整后仍具有统计学意义(P=0.005)。
早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与主要结局即伤后第3天基于血液的脑损伤生物标志物水平之间无关联。在探索性分析中,我们发现早期β受体阻滞剂可能与伤后第14天NSE水平降低有关。由于本研究的回顾性性质以及使用倾向加权分析来确定关联,因此不建议直接改变临床实践。然而,与NSE水平的显著关联值得通过前瞻性研究或随机对照试验进一步调查,以证实早期β受体阻滞剂暴露对神经元细胞损伤的潜在神经保护作用。