Suppr超能文献

种植体植入过程中低密度骨的实时热成像分析:一项比较侧向加压与骨钻孔手术技术的随机平行组临床研究。

Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique.

作者信息

Marković Aleksa, Mišić Tijana, Mančić Dragan, Jovanović Igor, Šćepanović Miodrag, Jezdić Zoran

机构信息

Clinic of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):910-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12191. Epub 2013 May 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of two surgical techniques, lateral condensation and bone drilling, on changes in temperature of the adjacent low-density bone during implant placement into posterior maxilla and to investigate the influence of the host factors - age, gender, region of implantation, bone density, and thickness of the cortical bone at the recipient sites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Local bone temperature was measured thermographically during implant placement into posterior maxilla following lateral bone condensing (test group) or bone drilling (controls). The main study outcomes were baseline bone temperature prior to implantation and maximum bone temperature recorded during implantation. Early implant success was evaluated after 6 months of healing.

RESULTS

A total of 40 implants were randomly allocated to test and control groups and placed into maxillary premolar and/or molar region of 18 participants of both genders and average age of 51.74 years. All recorded bone temperatures were below the threshold for thermal necrosis. Although both groups showed significant increase in bone temperature during implant placement procedure (P ≤ 0.0005), it was significantly higher for bone condensing compared with drilling (P ≤ 0.0005; 3.79 ± 1.54°C; 1.91 ± 0.70°C respectively). No host factor was singled out as a significant predictor of bone temperature changes, although trend of higher increase was observed in young patients, regardless of gender, during implant placement procedure into maxillary first premolar region with bone density type 3 and cortical layer thicker than 1 mm. Early implant success rate after 6 months follow-up was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Although both surgical techniques, bone condensing and bone drilling, can be considered safe regarding their thermal effect on the bone of posterior maxilla, bone drilling is associated with fewer local bone heating during implantation. Host factors do not affect the bone thermal changes significantly.

摘要

目的

比较两种手术技术,即侧方加压和骨钻孔,在向后上颌植入种植体过程中对相邻低密度骨温度变化的影响,并研究宿主因素——年龄、性别、植入区域、骨密度以及受植部位皮质骨厚度——的影响。

材料与方法

在采用侧方骨加压(试验组)或骨钻孔(对照组)向后上颌植入种植体的过程中,通过热成像法测量局部骨温度。主要研究结果为植入前的基线骨温度以及植入过程中记录的最高骨温度。在愈合6个月后评估早期种植体成功率。

结果

总共40枚种植体被随机分配至试验组和对照组,并植入18名平均年龄为51.74岁的男女参与者的上颌前磨牙和/或磨牙区域。所有记录的骨温度均低于热坏死阈值。尽管两组在种植体植入过程中骨温度均显著升高(P≤0.0005),但与钻孔相比,骨加压时的骨温度显著更高(P≤0.0005;分别为3.79±1.54°C和1.91±0.70°C)。尽管在向骨密度为3型且皮质层厚度超过1mm的上颌第一前磨牙区域植入种植体的过程中,无论性别,年轻患者的骨温度升高趋势更明显,但没有单一宿主因素被确定为骨温度变化的显著预测因素。6个月随访后的早期种植体成功率为100%。

结论

尽管骨加压和骨钻孔这两种手术技术对上颌后部骨的热效应均可视为安全,但骨钻孔在植入过程中引起的局部骨加热较少。宿主因素对骨热变化没有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验