Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Diabet Med. 2013 Nov;30(11):1293-7. doi: 10.1111/dme.12243. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
The goal of this study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of the basal insulin analogue, insulin degludec with insulin glargine (both with insulin aspart) in Type 1 diabetes, over a 2-year time period.
This open-label trial comprised a 1-year main trial and a 1-year extension. Patients were randomized to once-daily insulin degludec or insulin glargine and titrated to pre-breakfast plasma glucose values of 3.9-4.9 mmol/l.
The rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia was 25% lower with insulin degludec than with insulin glargine (P = 0.02). Rates of confirmed hypoglycaemia, severe hypoglycaemia and adverse events, and reductions in glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were similar between groups. Despite achieving similar glycaemic control, insulin degludec-treated patients used 12% less basal and 9% less total daily insulin than did insulin glargine-treated patients (P < 0.01).
Long-term basal therapy using insulin degludec in Type 1 diabetes required lower doses and was associated with a 25% lower risk for nocturnal hypoglycaemia than insulin glargine.
本研究旨在比较基础胰岛素类似物德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素(均与门冬胰岛素联用)在 1 型糖尿病患者中的长期安全性和疗效,随访时间为 2 年。
这是一项开放性标签试验,包括 1 年的主要试验和 1 年的扩展期。患者被随机分配接受每日一次德谷胰岛素或甘精胰岛素治疗,并滴定至早餐前血浆葡萄糖值 3.9-4.9mmol/L。
德谷胰岛素组夜间确诊低血糖的发生率比甘精胰岛素组低 25%(P=0.02)。两组间确诊低血糖、严重低血糖和不良事件的发生率以及糖化血红蛋白和空腹血浆葡萄糖的降低率相似。尽管血糖控制相似,但德谷胰岛素组患者的基础胰岛素和总日剂量分别比甘精胰岛素组少 12%和 9%(P<0.01)。
在 1 型糖尿病中使用德谷胰岛素进行长期基础治疗所需剂量更低,且夜间低血糖风险降低 25%。