Instituto de Medicina y Biología Experimental, Conicet, Argentina.
Brain Res. 2013 Aug 21;1527:149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 May 24.
Artificial grammars have been widely applied to the study of sequential learning in language, but few studies have directly compared the neural correlates of artificial and native grammar processing. In this study, we examined Event Related Potentials (ERPs) elicited by structural anomalies in semantic-free artificial grammar sequences and sentences in the subjects' native language (Spanish). Although ERPs differed during early stages, we observed similar posterior negativities (N400) and P600 effects in a late stage. We interpret these results as evidence of at least partially shared neural mechanisms for processing of language and artificial grammars. We suggest that in both the natural and artificial grammars, the N400 and P600 components we observed can be explained as the result of unfulfilled predictions about incoming stimuli.
人工语法已被广泛应用于语言顺序学习的研究,但很少有研究直接比较人工语法和母语语法处理的神经相关性。在这项研究中,我们检测了语义自由的人工语法序列和受试者母语(西班牙语)句子中的结构异常引发的事件相关电位(ERP)。虽然在早期阶段 ERP 有所不同,但我们在后期观察到了相似的后负性(N400)和 P600 效应。我们将这些结果解释为处理语言和人工语法的神经机制至少部分共享的证据。我们认为,在自然和人工语法中,我们观察到的 N400 和 P600 成分可以解释为对传入刺激的未满足预测的结果。