• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Access and adequacy of antenatal care in a city in Brazil during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.巴西一城市在 COVID-19 大流行的两个阶段的产前保健可及性和充分性。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Oct 23;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo87. eCollection 2024.
2
Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women.COVID-19大流行期间产前护理的充分性:对产后妇女的观察性研究
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;44(4):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741450. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies.COVID-19 对孕妇的产前母婴保健、社会支持和减压策略的体验和看法的影响。
Women Birth. 2022 May;35(3):307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Women's experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care during COVID-19 at public hospitals in the Sidama region, Ethiopia: A qualitative study using the combination of three delay and social-ecological framework (hybrid framework).埃塞俄比亚锡达玛地区公立医院在 COVID-19 期间接受产前和产时护理的女性体验:使用三个延迟和社会生态框架(混合框架)的定性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241274898. doi: 10.1177/17455057241274898.
5
COVID-19 and the adequacy of antenatal care among Indigenous women: A retrospective crossover analysis.COVID-19 与原住民妇女产前保健的充足性:回顾性交叉分析。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):432-440. doi: 10.1111/birt.12799. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Experiences of Canadian perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of open-ended survey responses.COVID-19大流行期间加拿大围产期护理经验:开放式调查回复分析
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251331696. doi: 10.1177/17455057251331696. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
7
Antenatal care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional survey among Filipino women.COVID-19 大流行期间的产前护理利用情况:一项针对菲律宾女性的在线横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05234-5.
8
Expectations of pregnant women for antenatal care services and factors affecting anxiety severity during the COVID-19 pandemic.孕妇对产前保健服务的期望以及 COVID-19 大流行期间影响焦虑严重程度的因素。
Ginekol Pol. 2022;93(2):142-150. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0179. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
Inequities in Adequacy of Prenatal Care and Shifts in Rural/Urban Differences Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行早期,产前保健充足程度的不平等和城乡差异的转变。
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Nov-Dec;34(6):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
10
Prenatal and postpartum care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An increase in barriers from early to mid-pandemic in the United States.COVID-19 大流行期间的产前和产后护理:美国大流行早期到中期障碍增加。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):450-458. doi: 10.1111/birt.12800. Epub 2023 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Syphilis in Susceptible Populations: Men Who Have Sex with Men, People Living with HIV, and Patients with Gestational and Congenital Syphilis-A Narrative Review.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对易感人群梅毒影响的分析:男男性行为者、艾滋病毒感染者以及妊娠梅毒和先天性梅毒患者——一项叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2025 May 25;13(6):1205. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061205.
2
Comment on: Access and adequacy of antenatal care in during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.关于《COVID-19大流行两个阶段的产前护理可及性与充分性》的评论
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Mar 17;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo12. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India.2019年冠状病毒病大流行所实施的限制措施对产前护理及妊娠结局的影响:一项来自印度北部农村地区的前瞻性观察研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e059701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059701.
2
Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women.COVID-19大流行期间产前护理的充分性:对产后妇女的观察性研究
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;44(4):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741450. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination rates in pregnant women in Scotland.苏格兰孕妇中 SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):504-512. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01666-2. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity.mRNA 疫苗接种与 COVID-19 住院和疾病严重程度的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 23;326(20):2043-2054. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19499.
5
Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care.英国 2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间的产科服务:对标准护理进行修改的全国调查。
BJOG. 2021 Apr;128(5):880-889. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16547. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期 2019 年冠状病毒病的临床表现、危险因素和母婴围产结局:系统评价的实时更新和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320.
7
[Assessment of care for high-risk pregnancy in four Brazilian metropolises].[巴西四个大都市高危妊娠护理评估]
Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36(5):e00120519. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00120519. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
Covid-19 and pregnancy.Covid-19 和怀孕。
BMJ. 2020 May 4;369:m1672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1672.
9
Access to prenatal care: assessment of the adequacy of different indices.产前保健的可及性:不同指标充足性的评估。
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Aug;29(8):1664-74. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00125612.
10
Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research.治疗妊娠期糖尿病的利弊:美国预防服务工作组和美国国立卫生研究院医学应用办公室的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):123-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661.

巴西一城市在 COVID-19 大流行的两个阶段的产前保健可及性和充分性。

Access and adequacy of antenatal care in a city in Brazil during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina FlorianópolisSC Brazil Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Universidade Federal de São Carlos São CarlosSão Paulo Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Oct 23;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo87. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo87
PMID:39530072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11554334/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare access and suitability of antenatal care between years 2020 and 2022 among postpartum individuals at a Hospital in Florianopolis, and evaluate factors associated with antenatal suitability.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional, and quantitative study carried out in 2022. Collected data were compared with the database of a previous similar study carried out in the same setting in 2020. Data were extracted from medical records and prenatal booklets, in addition to a face-to-face questionnaire. Adequacy was measured using the Carvalho and Novaes index and health access was qualitatively evaluated. Socio-demographic and antenatal variables were analyzed. A statistical significance level of 0.05 was considered. Open-ended questions were categorized for analysis.

RESULTS

395 postpartum individuals were included. Antenatal care was adequate for 48.6% in 2020 and 69.1% in 2022. Among the barriers to access, 56% reported difficulty in scheduling appointments and/or exams and 23% complained of reduced healthcare staff due to strikes, COVID-19, among others. Adequate antenatal care was associated with being pregnant in 2022, being referred to high-risk units (PNAR), and not reporting difficulties in access. Also, it was associated with twice the chance of investigation for gestational diabetes (GDM) and syphilis.

CONCLUSION

The 2022 post-vaccination period showed higher antenatal adequacy. The main difficulty for postpartum individuals was scheduling appointments and/or exams. Having antenatal care in 2022, no reports of difficulty in access, and follow-up at a high-risk unit were associated with antenatal adequacy.

摘要

目的

比较 2020 年和 2022 年弗洛里亚诺波利斯一家医院产后个体的产前保健可及性和适宜性,并评估与产前适宜性相关的因素。

方法

这是一项 2022 年进行的观察性、横断面和定量研究。将收集的数据与 2020 年在同一地点进行的先前类似研究的数据库进行比较。数据从病历和产前手册中提取,并结合面对面问卷进行收集。使用 Carvalho 和 Novaes 指数来衡量适宜性,并对卫生保健可及性进行定性评估。分析了社会人口学和产前变量。采用 0.05 的统计显著性水平。对开放式问题进行了分类分析。

结果

共纳入 395 名产后个体。2020 年和 2022 年,产前保健适宜率分别为 48.6%和 69.1%。在可及性障碍方面,56%的人报告预约和/或检查困难,23%的人抱怨因罢工、COVID-19 等原因医疗保健人员减少。适宜的产前保健与 2022 年怀孕、被转诊到高危单位(PNAR)以及没有报告可及性困难有关。此外,还与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)和梅毒检查的机会增加两倍有关。

结论

接种疫苗后的 2022 年显示出更高的产前适宜性。产后个体面临的主要困难是预约和/或检查。在 2022 年进行产前保健、没有报告可及性困难以及在高危单位接受随访与产前保健适宜性相关。