Chow Laura Q M
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. doi: 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e280.
Because of dramatic tumor regressions reported with the anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) antibodies inhibiting the PD-1 immune checkpoint, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is now recognized as an immune-modifiable disease. As responses were observed in smaller numbers in phase I trials, the immunologic profiles and unique toxicities of these agents have not been fully established in NSCLC. Moreover, PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors in development by different companies may demonstrate diverse spectrums of activity and toxicity. Although the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitors in earlier phase studies appeared to have less impressive responses in NSCLC, their safety profile has been more broadly defined. The anti-CTLA-4 antibody, ipilimumab, has the best characterized immune-related toxicities (predominantly skin, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and endocrine) and management strategies in melanoma. Despite the lack of studies directly comparing these agents, toxicities from PD-1 inhibition seem milder than those of CTLA-4 inhibition, with distinct toxicities of pneumonitis infrequently observed with the BMS-936558 anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumamb, and frequent mild infusion reactions reported with the BMS-936559 anti-PDL-1 antibody. As lungs are critical organs often already compromised in NSCLC patients, immune-mediated pneumonitis can cause worrisome morbidity and mortality. Even though immune checkpoint inhibitors are being rapidly developed in a multitude of trials, optimal immune-mediated toxicity management has not been determined, is evolving, and will be further explored. Early diagnosis and symptom management with corticosteroids form the basis of treatment. Assessment of new immune-response criteria and use of primary endpoints of overall survival (OS) will be important in the development of these immunotherapies in NSCLC.
由于抗程序性死亡-1(PD-1)和抗程序性死亡配体-1(PDL-1)抗体抑制PD-1免疫检查点后出现显著的肿瘤消退,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)现在被认为是一种可通过免疫调节的疾病。由于在I期试验中观察到的反应数量较少,这些药物的免疫学特征和独特毒性在NSCLC中尚未完全明确。此外,不同公司正在研发的PD-1检查点抑制剂可能表现出不同的活性和毒性谱。尽管早期研究中的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原-4(CTLA-4)检查点抑制剂在NSCLC中的反应似乎不那么令人印象深刻,但其安全性特征已得到更广泛的定义。抗CTLA-4抗体伊匹单抗在黑色素瘤中具有最明确的免疫相关毒性(主要是皮肤、胃肠道、肝脏和内分泌毒性)及管理策略。尽管缺乏直接比较这些药物的研究,但PD-1抑制的毒性似乎比CTLA-4抑制的毒性更轻,BMS-936558抗PD-1抗体纳武单抗很少观察到肺炎这种独特毒性,而BMS-936559抗PDL-1抗体则经常报告有轻度输液反应。由于肺是NSCLC患者中常常已经受损的关键器官,免疫介导的肺炎可导致令人担忧的发病率和死亡率。尽管免疫检查点抑制剂正在众多试验中迅速研发,但最佳的免疫介导毒性管理尚未确定,仍在不断发展,并将进一步探索。早期诊断和使用皮质类固醇进行症状管理是治疗的基础。评估新的免疫反应标准以及使用总生存期(OS)作为主要终点对于这些NSCLC免疫疗法的研发将很重要。