Critical Care Center, Hospital Sabadell, Consorci Hospitalari Universitari Parc Taulí, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Sabadell, Spain.
Critical Care Center, Hospital Sabadell, Consorci Hospitalari Universitari Parc Taulí, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Sabadell, Spain.
Chest. 2013 May;143(5):1219-1225. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1361.
Comatose patients present a high risk of early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (EO-VAP) for which antibiotic prophylaxis has been proposed. Comatose patients were studied to evaluate the efficacy of a single-dose of antibiotic prophylaxis at intubation against EO-VAP.
A prospective cohort of comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8) who were admitted in 2009-2010 and administered a single-dose of antibiotic within 4 h of intubation was compared with comatose patients (admitted ≥ 4 h after intubation in 2009-2010 or admitted in 2007-2008) who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. We analyzed the incidence of EO-VAP, late-onset VAP, and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in both groups. Propensity scores for receiving antibiotic prophylaxis were derived on the basis of patients' characteristics (eg, age and severity) to assess its impact on EO-VAP development.
We included 129 patients (71 in the prophylaxis group and 58 in the control group). The global incidence of VAP and incidence of EO-VAP were lower in the prophylaxis group: 10.8 vs 28.4 episodes/1,000 days on mechanical ventilation (P = .015) and 4.4 vs 23.1 episodes/1,000 days on mechanical ventilation (P = .02), respectively. The incidence of late-onset VAP did not differ. The prophylaxis group tended toward lower incidence of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (15.5% vs 25.9%, P = .14). No differences in mortality were found between groups. The propensity-score regression analysis confirmed that a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis was independently associated with lower incidence of EO-VAP (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.58; P = .009).
A single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis at intubation might lower the incidence of EO-VAP. However, a randomized clinical trial should be conducted to confirm our findings.
昏迷患者发生早发性呼吸机相关性肺炎(EO-VAP)的风险较高,因此提出了抗生素预防措施。本研究旨在评估对昏迷患者在插管后给予单剂量抗生素预防 EO-VAP 的效果。
将 2009-2010 年入院且在插管后 4 小时内给予单剂量抗生素的昏迷患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8 分)作为研究对象,并与未接受抗生素预防的昏迷患者(2009-2010 年插管 4 小时后入院或 2007-2008 年入院)进行比较。我们分析了两组患者 EO-VAP、迟发性 VAP 和呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎的发生率。基于患者特征(如年龄和严重程度),采用倾向评分来评估接受抗生素预防的影响。
共纳入 129 例患者(预防组 71 例,对照组 58 例)。预防组 VAP 总发生率和 EO-VAP 发生率较低:机械通气 1000 天的 VAP 发生率分别为 10.8 例/1000 天和 28.4 例/1000 天(P=0.015),机械通气 1000 天的 EO-VAP 发生率分别为 4.4 例/1000 天和 23.1 例/1000 天(P=0.02)。迟发性 VAP 发生率无差异。预防组呼吸机相关性气管支气管炎发生率较低(15.5%比 25.9%,P=0.14)。两组死亡率无差异。倾向评分回归分析证实,插管后给予单剂量抗生素预防与 EO-VAP 发生率降低独立相关(OR,0.11;95%CI,0.02-0.58;P=0.009)。
插管后给予单剂量抗生素预防可能降低 EO-VAP 的发生率。但是,需要进行随机临床试验来证实我们的发现。