Department of Neurology, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Bldg 1, Room 101, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013 Sep;10(3):254-63. doi: 10.1007/s11904-013-0165-9.
Despite increasing availability of anti-retroviral therapy, invasive cryptococcal disease continues to be a leading cause of death among HIV-infected individuals in resource-limited settings. Screening asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals with advanced immunosuppression for serum cryptococcal antigen clearly identifies a population at high risk of cryptococcal meningitis and death. However, screening with serum cryptococcal antigen alone identifies a heterogeneous clinical population, many of whom have mild clinical symptoms, sub-clinical meningeal infection, or fungemia. Currently, there is wide variation in practice and little evidence to guide the use of anti-fungal and anti-retroviral treatment for asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia (ACA). Furthermore, implementing a targeted screening and treatment intervention for ACA presents numerous operational challenges for already overburdened health care systems in resource-limited settings. While such an intervention shows promise, there are critical gaps in our understanding of ACA and its implications in the outpatient setting and an urgent need for additional research in this area.
尽管抗逆转录病毒疗法的可及性不断增加,但在资源有限的环境中,侵袭性隐球菌病仍然是 HIV 感染者死亡的主要原因。对晚期免疫抑制的无症状 HIV 感染者进行血清隐球菌抗原筛查,可明确识别出易患隐球菌性脑膜炎和死亡的高危人群。然而,仅用血清隐球菌抗原筛查会识别出一个异质的临床人群,其中许多人只有轻微的临床症状、亚临床脑膜感染或真菌血症。目前,实践中存在广泛的差异,几乎没有证据可以指导对无症状隐球菌抗原血症(ACA)使用抗真菌和抗逆转录病毒治疗。此外,为资源有限的环境中的已经负担过重的卫生保健系统实施针对 ACA 的筛查和治疗干预措施带来了诸多操作上的挑战。虽然这种干预措施显示出了希望,但我们对 ACA 及其在门诊环境中的意义的理解还存在很大的差距,迫切需要在这一领域开展更多的研究。