Suppr超能文献

[在莱茵兰-普法尔茨州(德国)死亡:首选和实际死亡地点]

[Dying in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany): preferred and actual place of death].

作者信息

Escobar Pinzon L C, Claus M, Zepf K I, Letzel S, Weber M

机构信息

Institut für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

Interdisziplinäre Einrichtung für Palliativmedizin, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Dec;75(12):853-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333740. Epub 2013 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Until now, no official statistics about the place of death in Germany exist.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to determine where people died in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany) in 2008, and which place of death was preferred. We further aimed to identify influencing factors on dying at home vs. dying in an -institution.

METHODS

Our cross-sectional survey was based on a random sample of 5000 inhabitants of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany) that had died between May and August 2008. Relatives of these deceased persons received a questionnaire containing socio-demographic and health-specific questions.

RESULTS

After removing duplicates, 4967 questionnaires were sent out. 3832 questionnaires were delivered and 1378 completed, leading to a response rate of 36.0%. 38.2% of the deceased died at home, 39.3% in a hospital, 13.4% in a nursing home, 7.5% in a palliative care facility and 1.6% elsewhere. 93.8% of the deceased who expressed a preference wanted to die at home. Altogether, 58.3% had their wish fulfilled. Suffering from cancer (aOR:1.30; 95% CI:1.01-1.68), social support (aOR being married:1.33; 95% CI:1.04-1.70; aOR having a non-/part-time working relative:1.71; 95% CI: 1.28-2.29), a high care level (aOR care level II:2.79; 95% CI: 2.06-3.79; aOR care level III: 4.96; 95% CI:3.40-7.24), and living in a rural municipality (aOR: 1.36; 95% CI:1.01-1.84) were factors favouring=BE; AE=favoring home death compared with institutional death.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, 4 of 10 patients who wanted to die at home could not die in their preferred place. Future studies should focus on the question as to what extent the strengthening of outpatient care structures, e. g., by introducing specialised=BE spezialized=AE outpatient palliative care, can allow more people to die at home.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,德国尚无关于死亡地点的官方统计数据。

目的

我们研究的目的是确定2008年德国莱茵兰-普法尔茨州居民的死亡地点,以及哪种死亡地点更受青睐。我们还旨在确定在家中死亡与在机构中死亡的影响因素。

方法

我们的横断面调查基于对2008年5月至8月间在德国莱茵兰-普法尔茨州死亡的5000名居民的随机抽样。这些死者的亲属收到了一份包含社会人口统计学和健康相关问题的问卷。

结果

去除重复问卷后,共发出4967份问卷。送达3832份,完成1378份,回复率为36.0%。38.2%的死者在家中死亡,39.3%在医院死亡,13.4%在养老院死亡,7.5%在姑息治疗机构死亡,1.6%在其他地方死亡。在表达了偏好的死者中,93.8%希望在家中死亡。总体而言,58.3%的人愿望得以实现。患有癌症(调整后比值比:1.30;95%置信区间:1.01-1.68)、社会支持(调整后比值比,已婚:1.33;95%置信区间:1.04-1.70;调整后比值比,有非在职/兼职亲属:1.71;95%置信区间:1.28-2.29)、高护理级别(调整后比值比,护理级别II:2.79;95%置信区间:2.06-3.79;调整后比值比,护理级别III:4.96;95%置信区间:3.40-7.24)以及居住在农村自治市(调整后比值比:1.36;95%置信区间:1.01-1.84)是与机构死亡相比更有利于在家中死亡的因素。

结论

总体而言,10名希望在家中死亡的患者中有4人未能在其偏好的地点死亡。未来的研究应聚焦于加强门诊护理结构(例如,通过引入专门的门诊姑息治疗)能在多大程度上让更多人在家中死亡这一问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验