• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国的死亡地点偏好。

Preference for place of death in Germany.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1097-103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0136.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2011.0136
PMID:22004148
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dying in the preferred place is considered a key requirement for a "good death." The aims of our study were to explore preferred places of death of deceased people and their bereaved relatives in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany). We further wanted to assess the congruence between preferred and actual place of death.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was based on a random sample of 5000 inhabitants of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany) who died between May 25 and August 24, 2008. Relatives of these deceased persons were interviewed by a written survey.

RESULTS

After removing duplicates, 4967 questionnaires were sent out, 3832 delivered, and 1378 completed, yielding a response rate of 36.0%. Regarding the deceased, 93.8% wanted to die at home, 0.7% in a hospital, 2.8% in palliative care, 2.4% in a nursing home, and 0.3% elsewhere. The figures for the relatives were 80.7%, 4.3%, 7.5%, 7.1%, and 0.5%, respectively. Of the deceased 58.9% and of the relatives 59.1% had their wish fulfilled. Logistic regression analysis revealed that living in a rural municipality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.43), rural town (aOR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.17-4.49) or small town (aOR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.04-3.68), having a nonworking relative (aOR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.16-2.76), and living together with a relative (aOR: 2.28; 95% CI:1.57-3.32) increases the probability to die in the preferred place.

DISCUSSION

Because the availability of a relative was the most important factor to die in the preferred place, relatives of dying people should be supported in providing informal care. The introduction of palliative home care teams should allow more people to die in their preferred place by easing the burden of informal carers.

摘要

背景

在首选地点去世被认为是“善终”的关键要求。我们的研究目的是探讨莱茵兰-普法尔茨州(德国)去世者及其亲属的首选死亡地点。我们还想评估首选和实际死亡地点之间的一致性。

方法

这项横断面研究基于对 2008 年 5 月 25 日至 8 月 24 日期间在莱茵兰-普法尔茨州去世的 5000 名居民的随机样本。通过书面调查对这些死者的亲属进行了采访。

结果

剔除重复项后,共发出 4967 份问卷,送达 3832 份,完成 1378 份,应答率为 36.0%。对于死者,93.8%希望在家中去世,0.7%希望在医院,2.8%希望在姑息治疗病房,2.4%希望在养老院,0.3%希望在其他地方。对于亲属,相应的数字分别为 80.7%、4.3%、7.5%、7.1%和 0.5%。死者中 58.9%和亲属中 59.1%的人实现了自己的愿望。逻辑回归分析显示,居住在农村市(调整后的优势比[aOR]:1.88;95%置信区间[CI]:1.02-3.43)、农村镇(aOR:2.30;95%CI:1.17-4.49)或小镇(aOR:1.95;95%CI:1.04-3.68)、有非工作亲属(aOR:1.79;95%CI:1.16-2.76)和与亲属一起居住(aOR:2.28;95%CI:1.57-3.32)增加了在首选地点死亡的可能性。

讨论

由于亲属的可用性是在首选地点去世的最重要因素,因此应支持临终者的亲属提供非正式护理。姑息治疗家庭护理团队的引入应通过减轻非正式护理者的负担,使更多的人能够在他们首选的地点去世。

相似文献

1
Preference for place of death in Germany.德国的死亡地点偏好。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1097-103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0136.
2
Factors influencing place of death in Germany.影响德国死亡地点的因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 May;41(5):893-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
3
[Dying in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany): preferred and actual place of death].[在莱茵兰-普法尔茨州(德国)死亡:首选和实际死亡地点]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Dec;75(12):853-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333740. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire.英国的临终关怀与实现死亡地点偏好:使用VOICES-SF问卷进行的基于人群调查结果
Palliat Med. 2014 May;28(5):412-21. doi: 10.1177/0269216313512012. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
Japanese people's preference for place of end-of-life care and death: a population-based nationwide survey.日本人对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好:一项基于人群的全国性调查。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):882-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.024.
6
Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark.丹麦晚期癌症患者对死亡地点的偏好。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Dec;25(4):627-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00870.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
7
Preferred place of death--a local study of cancer patients and their relatives.死亡的首选地点——一项针对癌症患者及其亲属的本地研究。
Singapore Med J. 1998 Oct;39(10):447-50.
8
Symptom prevalence in the last days of life in Germany: the role of place of death.德国生命终末期的症状流行情况:死亡地点的作用。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Sep;29(6):431-7. doi: 10.1177/1049909111425228. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
9
Dying in Germany--unfulfilled needs of relatives in different care settings.在德国死亡——不同照护环境下的亲属的未满足需求。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Oct;44(4):542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.024. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
10
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.将养老院选为最不愿离世的场所:一项对七个欧洲国家公众偏好的跨国调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Oct 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Place of Death of Cancer Patients Treated at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center.在德国综合癌症中心接受治疗的癌症患者的死亡地点。
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 May 22;6(1):273-281. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0097. eCollection 2025.
2
Reasons for and Congruence Between Preferred and Actual Place of Death Among Cancer Patients Receiving End-of-Life Care: A Cross-Cultural Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in East Asia.接受临终关怀的癌症患者首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点之间的原因及一致性:东亚的一项跨文化多中心前瞻性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;17(13):2062. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132062.
3
"The patient as teacher" - thematic analysis of undergraduate medical students' experiences with an experiential learning project in palliative care.
“患者即教师”——对本科医学生参与姑息治疗体验式学习项目的经验进行的主题分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Oct 9;23(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01570-9.
4
Non-kin caregivers of terminally ill people: Contributions, experiences, and needs: A protocol for a mixed-methods study.终末期疾病患者的非亲属照护者:贡献、经历和需求:一项混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306282. eCollection 2024.
5
End-of-Life Care Preferences of Patients with Advanced Urological Malignancies: An Explorative Survey Study at a Tertiary Referral Center.晚期泌尿系统恶性肿瘤患者的临终关怀偏好:三级转诊中心的探索性调查研究。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jan 12;31(1):462-471. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31010031.
6
Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature.提高在家中去世的几率:使姑息治疗成为可能的全科医生的角色、任务和方法:定性文献的系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02038-0.
7
"I Needed to Know, No Matter What I Do, I Won't Make It Worse"-Expectations and Experiences of Last Aid Course Participants in Germany-A Qualitative Pilot Study.“无论我做什么,我都需要知道自己不会让情况变得更糟”——德国急救课程参与者的期望与经历——一项定性试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 16;11(4):592. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040592.
8
Characteristics and place of death in home care recipients in Germany - an analysis of nationwide health insurance claims data.德国居家护理接受者的特征和死亡地点 - 基于全国健康保险索赔数据的分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 6;21(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01060-w.
9
Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care-an Interim Assessment.专科门诊姑息治疗——中期评估
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 May 6;119(18):325-326. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0192.
10
Outpatient palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective single centre analysis in Germany.COVID-19 大流行期间的门诊姑息治疗:德国的回顾性单中心分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 12;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01035-x.