Galanti Maria Rosaria, Coppo Alessandro, Jonsson Elin, Bremberg Sven, Faggiano Fabrizio
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Health Care District, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(4):295-301. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050846. Epub 2013 May 28.
To summarise the evidence on effectiveness of school anti-tobacco policies (exposure) in preventing tobacco use (outcome) among high school students.
The search was conducted between 1 September and 30 November 2011 on six electronic databases with keywords: 'policy', 'ban', 'restriction' and 'environment' in combination with 'adolescent' or 'student', 'school' and 'smoking' in titles, abstracts or keywords. Restrictions were made to articles published in English.
Studies were included if they targeted the relevant grades/age; reported at least one outcome measure of students' ever or current tobacco use; reported on the effects of exposure to policy separately from other interventions. Inclusion criteria were assessed independently by two of the coauthors. Of 2723 articles initially identified, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria (1.1%).
Independent multiple observers extracted the data following the GRADE system guidelines to classify the level of evidence in relation to the review objective.
Studies were very heterogeneous in the definitions of exposure to school anti-tobacco policy and of tobacco use, adjustment for potential confounders and reporting of results, therefore summary quantitative measures of effect were not calculated. Qualitative summary statements were derived by reviewing the results reported in text and tables for distinct policy constructs. Evidence could be classified as low or very low, resting on cross-sectional studies with high risk of bias. Studies were rather consistent in indicating that comprehensive smoking bans, clear rules, strict policy enforcement, availability of education and prevention were associated with decreased smoking prevalence. Formally adopted and written policies, surveillance of students' behaviour and presence/severity of sanctions were not consistently associated to students' tobacco use.
The evidence concerning the effectiveness of a school policy alone in preventing youth tobacco use is weak and inconclusive. Experimental studies or observational studies with longitudinal design are warranted, employing clear definitions of policy components and careful control for confounding.
总结学校反烟草政策(暴露因素)在预防高中生烟草使用(结果)方面有效性的证据。
于2011年9月1日至11月30日期间在六个电子数据库进行检索,关键词为:“政策”“禁令”“限制”和“环境”,并与标题、摘要或关键词中的“青少年”或“学生”“学校”及“吸烟”相结合。检索限于英文发表的文章。
纳入的研究需针对相关年级/年龄;报告至少一项关于学生曾经或当前烟草使用的结果指标;分别报告政策暴露的影响与其他干预措施的影响。纳入标准由两位共同作者独立评估。最初识别出的2723篇文章中,31篇符合纳入标准(1.1%)。
独立的多名观察者按照GRADE系统指南提取数据,以对与综述目标相关的证据水平进行分类。
关于学校反烟草政策暴露和烟草使用的定义、对潜在混杂因素的调整以及结果报告,各研究差异很大,因此未计算效应的汇总定量指标。通过审查针对不同政策结构在文本和表格中报告的结果得出定性汇总陈述。基于存在高偏倚风险的横断面研究,证据可归类为低或极低。各研究在表明全面吸烟禁令、明确规则、严格政策执行、教育和预防的可及性与吸烟率降低相关方面较为一致。正式通过和书面的政策、对学生行为的监测以及制裁的存在/严厉程度与学生烟草使用之间并无一致关联。
关于仅学校政策在预防青少年烟草使用方面有效性的证据薄弱且无定论。有必要开展实验研究或采用纵向设计的观察性研究,明确政策组成部分的定义并仔细控制混杂因素。