• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低倍体多发性骨髓瘤的分子标志物比非低倍体多发性骨髓瘤更具侵袭性。

Hypodiploid multiple myeloma is characterized by more aggressive molecular markers than non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

出版信息

Haematologica. 2013 Oct;98(10):1586-92. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.081083. Epub 2013 May 28.

DOI:10.3324/haematol.2012.081083
PMID:23716545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3789464/
Abstract

Multiple myeloma can be categorized into hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid myeloma based on the number of chromosomes found in the tumor clone. Among the non-hyperdiploid myelomas, the hypodiploid subtype has the most aggressive clinical phenotype, but the genetic differences between groups are not completely defined. In order to understand the genetic background of hypodiploid multiple myeloma better, we compared the genomic (array-based comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic (gene expression profiling) background of 49 patients with hypodiploid myeloma with 50 other non-hyperdiploid and 125 hyperdiploid myeloma patients. There were significant chromosomal and gene expression differences between hyperdiploid patients and non-hyperdiploid and hypodiploid patients. Non-hyperdiploid and hypodiploid patients shared most of the chromosomal abnormalities; nevertheless a subset of these abnormalities, such as monosomies 13, 14 and 22, was markedly increased in hypodiploid patients. Furthermore, deletions of 1p, 12p, 16q and 17p, all associated with poor outcome or progression in multiple myeloma, were significantly enriched in hypodiploid patients. Molecular risk-stratification indices reinforce the worse prognosis associated with hypodiploid multiple myeloma compared with non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma. Gene expression profiling clustered hypodiploid and non-hyperdiploid subgroups closer than hyperdiploid myeloma but also highlighted the up-regulation of CCND2, WHSC1/MMSET and FGFR3 in the hypodiploid subtype. In summary, hypodiploid multiple myeloma is genetically similar to non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma but characterized by a higher prevalence of genetic alterations associated with poor outcome and disease progression. It is provocative to hypothesize that hypodiploid multiple myeloma is an advanced stage of non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

摘要

多发性骨髓瘤可以根据肿瘤克隆中发现的染色体数量分为超二倍体或非超二倍体骨髓瘤。在非超二倍体骨髓瘤中,亚二倍体亚型具有最具侵袭性的临床表型,但各组之间的遗传差异尚未完全确定。为了更好地了解亚二倍体多发性骨髓瘤的遗传背景,我们比较了 49 例亚二倍体骨髓瘤患者、50 例非超二倍体和 125 例超二倍体骨髓瘤患者的基因组(基于阵列的比较基因组杂交)和转录组(基因表达谱分析)背景。超二倍体患者与非超二倍体和亚二倍体患者之间存在显著的染色体和基因表达差异。非超二倍体和亚二倍体患者共享大多数染色体异常;然而,这些异常中的一部分,如 13、14 和 22 号单体,在亚二倍体患者中明显增加。此外,与多发性骨髓瘤不良预后或进展相关的 1p、12p、16q 和 17p 缺失在亚二倍体患者中显著富集。分子风险分层指数进一步强化了与非超二倍体多发性骨髓瘤相比,亚二倍体多发性骨髓瘤预后更差的结论。基因表达谱分析将亚二倍体和非超二倍体亚组聚类得比超二倍体骨髓瘤更接近,但也突出了亚二倍体亚型中 CCND2、WHSC1/MMSET 和 FGFR3 的上调。总之,亚二倍体多发性骨髓瘤在遗传上与非超二倍体多发性骨髓瘤相似,但具有更高的与不良预后和疾病进展相关的遗传改变发生率。假设亚二倍体多发性骨髓瘤是非超二倍体多发性骨髓瘤的晚期阶段,这是一个很有启发性的假说。

相似文献

1
Hypodiploid multiple myeloma is characterized by more aggressive molecular markers than non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.低倍体多发性骨髓瘤的分子标志物比非低倍体多发性骨髓瘤更具侵袭性。
Haematologica. 2013 Oct;98(10):1586-92. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.081083. Epub 2013 May 28.
2
Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: a single-institution experience. 额外结构染色体异常与超二倍体多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床预后不良相关:单中心经验。
Mod Pathol. 2017 Jun;30(6):843-853. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.3. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Further cytogenetic characterization of multiple myeloma confirms that 14q32 translocations are a very rare event in hyperdiploid cases.多发性骨髓瘤的进一步细胞遗传学特征证实,在超二倍体病例中,14q32易位是非常罕见的事件。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003 Nov;38(3):234-9. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10275.
4
The prognostic significance of cytogenetics and molecular profiling in multiple myeloma.细胞遗传学和分子图谱在多发性骨髓瘤中的预后意义。
Cancer Genet. 2011 Jan;204(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.11.002.
5
Immunophenotype and DNA content of myeloma cells in primary plasma cell leukemia.
Am J Hematol. 1992 Mar;39(3):159-62. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830390302.
6
Is flow cytometric DNA content hypodiploidy prognostic in multiple myeloma?流式细胞术检测的DNA含量亚二倍体在多发性骨髓瘤中具有预后价值吗?
Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Sep;35(1-2):83-9. doi: 10.3109/10428199909145707.
7
Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.亚二倍体是多发性骨髓瘤的一个主要预后因素。
Blood. 2001 Oct 1;98(7):2229-38. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.7.2229.
8
Chromosome aberrations in a series of 120 multiple myeloma cases with abnormal karyotypes.120例核型异常的多发性骨髓瘤病例中的染色体畸变
Am J Hematol. 2007 Dec;82(12):1080-7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20998.
9
Masked hypodiploidy: Hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) mimicking hyperdiploid ALL in children: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.隐匿性亚二倍体:儿童中表现为超二倍体急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的亚二倍体急性淋巴细胞白血病:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Cancer Genet. 2019 Oct;238:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Hyperdiploidy is a common finding in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and monosomy 13 is restricted to these hyperdiploid patients.超二倍体在意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病中很常见,而13号染色体单体仅局限于这些超二倍体患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 15;13(20):6026-31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0031.

引用本文的文献

1
The Genetic and Molecular Drivers of Multiple Myeloma: Current Insights, Clinical Implications, and the Path Forward.多发性骨髓瘤的遗传和分子驱动因素:当前见解、临床意义及未来方向
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2024 Dec 21;17:573-609. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S350238. eCollection 2024.
2
The FGF/FGFR/c-Myc axis as a promising therapeutic target in multiple myeloma.FGF/FGFR/c-Myc 轴作为多发性骨髓瘤有前景的治疗靶点。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 1;43(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13046-024-03217-2.
3
Predicting cytogenetic risk in multiple myeloma using conventional whole-body MRI, spinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and spinal diffusion-weighted imaging.使用传统全身MRI、脊柱动态对比增强MRI和脊柱扩散加权成像预测多发性骨髓瘤的细胞遗传学风险。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Apr 10;15(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01672-1.
4
Complex karyotype determined using conventional cytogenetic analysis is a poor prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma.采用常规细胞遗传学分析确定的复杂核型是多发性骨髓瘤患者的预后不良因素。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2024;64(1):10-20. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.23047.
5
Autophagy-related genes affect the survival of multiple myeloma patients depending on chromosomal abnormality.自噬相关基因根据染色体异常情况影响多发性骨髓瘤患者的生存。
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2023 Jun 16;16(5):249-264. doi: 10.2478/abm-2022-0028. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Single cell clonotypic and transcriptional evolution of multiple myeloma precursor disease.多发性骨髓瘤前体疾病的单细胞克隆和转录进化。
Cancer Cell. 2023 Jun 12;41(6):1032-1047.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.05.007.
7
Treatment Strategies for Multiple Myeloma Treatment and the Role of High-Throughput Screening for Precision Cancer Therapy.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗策略和高通量筛选在精准癌症治疗中的作用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1436:167-185. doi: 10.1007/5584_2023_775.
8
Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: Incidence, Prognostic Significance, and Geographic Heterogeneity in Indian and Western Populations.多发性骨髓瘤的细胞遗传学异常:印度和西方人群中的发病率、预后意义及地理异质性
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2022;162(10):529-540. doi: 10.1159/000529191. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
9
Immunophenotypic Characterization and Ploidy Analysis of Neoplastic Plasma Cells by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.多参数流式细胞术对肿瘤性浆细胞的免疫表型特征及倍体分析
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;38(3):473-480. doi: 10.1007/s12288-021-01477-y. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
Evidence for ABL Amplification in Multiple Myeloma and Therapeutic Implications.多发性骨髓瘤中ABL基因扩增的证据及其治疗意义。
J Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;2022:4112016. doi: 10.1155/2022/4112016. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤中具有交替优势的克隆竞争。
Blood. 2012 Aug 2;120(5):1067-76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-405985. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
2
The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的遗传结构。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Apr 12;12(5):335-48. doi: 10.1038/nrc3257.
3
Longitudinal genome-wide analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia reveals complex evolution of clonal architecture at disease progression and at the time of relapse.慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的纵向全基因组分析揭示了疾病进展和复发时克隆结构的复杂演变。
Leukemia. 2012 Jul;26(7):1698-701. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.14. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
APRIL promotes cell-cycle progression in primary multiple myeloma cells: influence of D-type cyclin group and translocation status.APRIL 促进原发性多发性骨髓瘤细胞的细胞周期进程:D 型细胞周期蛋白组和易位状态的影响。
Blood. 2011 Jan 20;117(3):890-901. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264424. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
5
A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value.骨髓瘤相关染色体拷贝数异常及其预后价值概述。
Blood. 2010 Oct 14;116(15):e56-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279596. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
6
Prognostic significance of copy-number alterations in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤中拷贝数改变的预后意义
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4585-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6136. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
7
Identification of copy number abnormalities and inactivating mutations in two negative regulators of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathways in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia.在华氏巨球蛋白血症中核因子-κB信号通路两个负调控因子的拷贝数异常及失活突变的鉴定
Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;69(8):3579-88. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3701. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
8
Effect of tissue shipping on plasma cell isolation, viability, and RNA integrity in the context of a centralized good laboratory practice-certified tissue banking facility.在一个经过集中式良好实验室规范认证的组织库设施背景下,组织运输对浆细胞分离、活力及RNA完整性的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Mar;17(3):666-73. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2649.
9
The centrosome index is a powerful prognostic marker in myeloma and identifies a cohort of patients that might benefit from aurora kinase inhibition.中心体指数是骨髓瘤中一种强大的预后标志物,可识别出可能从极光激酶抑制中获益的患者群体。
Blood. 2008 Feb 1;111(3):1603-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097774. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
10
Promiscuous mutations activate the noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway in multiple myeloma.杂乱突变激活多发性骨髓瘤中的非经典核因子κB通路。
Cancer Cell. 2007 Aug;12(2):131-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.003.