Suppr超能文献

对疼痛保持警觉会使个体成为面部疼痛识别方面的专家吗?

Does vigilance to pain make individuals experts in facial recognition of pain?

机构信息

Department of Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2013 Jul-Aug;18(4):191-6. doi: 10.1155/2013/371428. Epub 2013 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well known that individual factors are important in the facial recognition of pain. However, it is unclear whether vigilance to pain as a pain-related attentional mechanism is among these relevant factors.

OBJECTIVES

Vigilance to pain may have two different effects on the recognition of facial pain expressions: pain-vigilant individuals may detect pain faces better but overinclude other facial displays, misinterpreting them as expressing pain; or they may be true experts in discriminating between pain and other facial expressions. The present study aimed to test these two hypotheses. Furthermore, pain vigilance was assumed to be a distinct predictor, the impact of which on recognition cannot be completely replaced by related concepts such as pain catastrophizing and fear of pain.

METHODS

Photographs of neutral, happy, angry and pain facial expressions were presented to 40 healthy participants, who were asked to classify them into the appropriate emotion categories and provide a confidence rating for each classification. Additionally, potential predictors of the discrimination performance for pain and anger faces - pain vigilance, pain-related catastrophizing, fear of pain--were assessed using self-report questionnaires.

RESULTS

Pain-vigilant participants classified pain faces more accurately and did not misclassify anger as pain faces more frequently. However, vigilance to pain was not related to the confidence of recognition ratings. Pain catastrophizing and fear of pain did not account for the recognition performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate pain vigilance, as assessed in the present study, appears to be associated with appropriate detection of pain-related cues and not necessarily with the overinclusion of other negative cues.

摘要

背景

众所周知,个体因素在面部疼痛识别中很重要。然而,作为一种与疼痛相关的注意机制,对疼痛的警觉是否属于这些相关因素尚不清楚。

目的

对疼痛的警觉可能对面部疼痛表情的识别有两种不同的影响:警觉性高的个体可能会更好地察觉疼痛面孔,但也可能会过度包含其他面部表情,将其错误地解释为表达疼痛;或者他们可能是区分疼痛和其他面部表情的真正专家。本研究旨在检验这两种假设。此外,疼痛警觉被认为是一个独特的预测指标,其对识别的影响不能完全被疼痛灾难化和对疼痛的恐惧等相关概念所取代。

方法

向 40 名健康参与者呈现中性、快乐、愤怒和疼痛的面部表情照片,要求他们将这些照片分类到适当的情绪类别,并对每一次分类提供信心评分。此外,使用自我报告问卷评估疼痛和愤怒面孔的辨别性能的潜在预测因素——疼痛警觉、与疼痛相关的灾难化、对疼痛的恐惧。

结果

警觉性高的参与者对面部疼痛的分类更准确,且不会将愤怒错误地分类为疼痛。然而,对疼痛的警觉与识别评分的信心无关。疼痛灾难化和对疼痛的恐惧并不能解释识别性能。

结论

在本研究中评估的适度疼痛警觉似乎与适当察觉与疼痛相关的线索有关,而不一定与过度包含其他负面线索有关。

相似文献

6
Perceptual bias of patients with schizophrenia in morphed facial expression.精神分裂症患者对面部表情变形的感知偏差。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Jan 30;185(1-2):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
9
Postauricular and eyeblink startle responses to facial expressions.耳后及眨眼对面部表情的惊吓反应。
Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):431-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00516.x. Epub 2007 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

6
A prospective sequential analysis of the fear-avoidance model of pain.疼痛恐惧回避模型的前瞻性序列分析。
Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.022. Epub 2009 May 23.
7
Pain catastrophizing: a critical review.疼痛灾难化:一项批判性综述。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 May;9(5):745-58. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.34.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验