• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[比较效果研究的设计、实施与分析概述]

[Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].

作者信息

Liao Xing, Xie Yan-Ming, Tian Feng, Shen Hao

机构信息

Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;38(6):930-5.

PMID:23717982
Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has been regarded as a hot topic in health care recently. Many medicalresearchers currently deem CER as a potential powerful instrument for improving the quality of healthcare and cut medical cost. However, in the past, classic efficacy studies are always focusing on comparing one new intervention with placebo under complete controlled environment. Now CER turns to comparing different interventions directly in real world of routine practice. This article reviewed a series of literature about the design, implementation and analysis of CER in order to give a clue for Chinese medicine researchers in future.

摘要

比较效果研究(CER)最近被视为医疗保健领域的一个热门话题。目前,许多医学研究人员认为CER是提高医疗质量和降低医疗成本的一种潜在有力工具。然而,过去经典的疗效研究总是侧重于在完全受控的环境下将一种新干预措施与安慰剂进行比较。现在,CER转向在常规实践的现实世界中直接比较不同的干预措施。本文回顾了一系列关于CER设计、实施和分析的文献,以便为未来的中医研究人员提供线索。

相似文献

1
[Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].[比较效果研究的设计、实施与分析概述]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;38(6):930-5.
2
Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.传统药物和食品的临床研究——比较有效性研究为跨学科研究带来的潜力。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 May 2;147(1):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
3
Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.围手术期比较效果研究。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):535-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.004.
4
The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部比较效果研究的过去、现在和未来。
Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.002.
5
The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.在比较疗效研究中使用患者报告的结局(PRO):对临床实践和医疗保健政策的影响。
Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1060-70. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268aaff.
6
The methods of comparative effectiveness research.比较疗效研究的方法。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:425-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124610. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.实用随机对照试验(pRCTs)在比较效果研究中的作用。
Clin Trials. 2012 Aug;9(4):436-46. doi: 10.1177/1740774512450097. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
8
The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.比较效 用研究在输血医学临床试验中的作用:国家心、肺、血液研究所研讨会的报告。
Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
9
An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.比较疗效研究方法概述。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan;24(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.09.002.
10
An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.介绍比较效果研究。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):425-34; discussion 434. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320a9e.