Favre Julien, Scanlan Sean F, Erhart-Hledik Jenifer C, Blazek Katerina, Andriacchi Thomas P
J Biomech Eng. 2013 Oct 1;135(10):101002-10. doi: 10.1115/1.4024629.
Measures of mean cartilage thickness over predefined regions in the femoral plate using magnetic resonance imaging have provided important insights into the characteristics of knee osteoarthritis (OA), however, this quantification method suffers from the limited ability to detect OA-related differences between knees and loses potentially important information regarding spatial variations in cartilage thickness. The objectives of this study were to develop a new method for analyzing patterns of femoral cartilage thickness and to test the following hypotheses: (1) asymptomatic knees have similar thickness patterns, (2) thickness patterns differ with knee OA, and (3) thickness patterns are more sensitive than mean thicknesses to differences between OA conditions. Bi-orthogonal thickness patterns were extracted from thickness maps of segmented magnetic resonance images in the medial, lateral, and trochlea compartments. Fifty asymptomatic knees were used to develop the method and establish reference asymptomatic patterns. Another subgroup of 20 asymptomatic knees and three subgroups of 20 OA knees each with a Kellgren/Lawrence grade (KLG) of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were selected for hypotheses testing. The thickness patterns were similar between asymptomatic knees (coefficient of multiple determination between 0.8 and 0.9). The thickness pattern alterations, i.e., the differences between the thickness patterns of an individual knee and reference asymptomatic thickness patterns, increased with increasing OA severity (Kendall correlation between 0.23 and 0.47) and KLG 2 and 3 knees had significantly larger thickness pattern alterations than asymptomatic knees in the three compartments. On average, the number of significant differences detected between the four subgroups was 4.5 times greater with thickness pattern alterations than mean thicknesses. The increase was particularly marked in the medial compartment, where the number of significant differences between subgroups was 10 times greater with thickness pattern alterations than mean thickness measurements. Asymptomatic knees had characteristic regional thickness patterns and these patterns were different in medial OA knees. Assessing the thickness patterns, which account for the spatial variations in cartilage thickness and capture both cartilage thinning and swelling, could enhance the capacity to detect OA-related differences between knees.
使用磁共振成像测量股骨平台预定义区域的平均软骨厚度,为深入了解膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的特征提供了重要见解。然而,这种量化方法在检测膝关节之间与OA相关的差异方面能力有限,并且会丢失有关软骨厚度空间变化的潜在重要信息。本研究的目的是开发一种分析股骨软骨厚度模式的新方法,并检验以下假设:(1)无症状膝关节具有相似的厚度模式;(2)厚度模式因膝关节OA而不同;(3)厚度模式比平均厚度对OA病情之间的差异更敏感。从内侧、外侧和滑车关节的分割磁共振图像厚度图中提取双正交厚度模式。使用50个无症状膝关节来开发该方法并建立参考无症状模式。另外选取了20个无症状膝关节亚组和三个分别具有Kellgren/Lawrence分级(KLG)为1、2和3的20个OA膝关节亚组进行假设检验。无症状膝关节之间的厚度模式相似(多重决定系数在0.8至0.9之间)。厚度模式改变,即个体膝关节的厚度模式与参考无症状厚度模式之间的差异,随着OA严重程度的增加而增加(Kendall相关性在0.23至0.47之间),并且KLG 2和3级膝关节在三个关节间的厚度模式改变明显大于无症状膝关节。平均而言,厚度模式改变检测到的四个亚组之间的显著差异数量比平均厚度多4.5倍。这种增加在内侧关节间尤为明显,其中亚组之间的显著差异数量,厚度模式改变比平均厚度测量多10倍。无症状膝关节具有特征性的区域厚度模式,而这些模式在内侧OA膝关节中有所不同。评估厚度模式,其考虑了软骨厚度的空间变化并同时捕捉软骨变薄和肿胀情况,可能会增强检测膝关节之间与OA相关差异的能力。