刻意随意？澳大利亚工人的代理机构、健康和非标准就业关系。
Deliberately casual? Workers' agency, health, and nonstandard employment relations in Australia.
机构信息
Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
出版信息
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Jun;55(6):620-7. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829176eb.
OBJECTIVE
We explored Australian workers' experiences of nonstandard employment, how it related to health and well-being, and the role that Bourdieu's forms of capital (cultural, economic, and social resources) played in underpinning workers' agency.
METHODS
Qualitative data from semistructured interviews with 32 causal workers were analyzed on the basis of framework analysis.
RESULTS
Most participants were "deliberate casuals" who had chosen casual over permanent employment, with half of that group naming improved health and well-being as motivation. Those with greater access to capital felt more able to exercise choice, whereas those with fewer capital resources felt constrained to be casual. Gendered structures and labor market dynamics were also significant in shaping agency.
CONCLUSIONS
Access to capital and a buoyant labor market underpinned workers' agency in Australia, enabling some to gain health and well-being benefits from nonstandard employment.
目的
本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚劳动者非标准就业的经历，以及其与健康和福祉的关系，同时还分析了布尔迪厄的资本形式（文化、经济和社会资源）在支撑劳动者能动性方面所起的作用。
方法
基于框架分析法，对 32 名临时工的半结构化访谈进行了定性数据分析。
结果
大多数参与者是“故意选择临时工”，他们选择临时工而非永久性工作，其中一半的人表示改善健康和福祉是选择的动机。那些拥有更多资本资源的人感觉更有能力行使选择，而那些拥有较少资本资源的人则感到被迫选择临时工。性别结构和劳动力市场动态在塑造能动性方面也很重要。
结论
资本的可获得性和充满活力的劳动力市场支撑了澳大利亚劳动者的能动性，使一些人能够从非标准就业中获得健康和福祉的好处。
Zotero 插件