Department of Health Policy and Public Health, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):E20-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318269e434.
Local health departments (LHDs) were responsible for administering vaccine to the public during the 2009 H1N1 campaign but had relatively little guidance or experience to inform such a large campaign with limited vaccine supply. They used various processes to deliver vaccines to the public. Learning from the LHDs that were successful in their public vaccination campaigns can help inform future vaccination efforts.
To learn from H1N1 campaign in order to improve responses to similar events in the future. We used a positive deviance approach to identify positive outlier LHDs during the 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaigns. We then used realist evaluation to learn about the combinations of context and mechanisms that led select LHDs to perform well.
This project was a retrospective qualitative study. We used process mapping to define the steps involved in implementing public vaccination clinics. We identified positive outliers in H1N1 public vaccination efforts and conducted in-depth interviews with LHD staff to learn about the context and mechanisms that led to successful public vaccination clinics.
This study focused on positive outliers in LHD vaccination efforts during the 2009 H1N1 campaign that implemented public vaccination clinics.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Study outcomes focused on the combinations of context and mechanisms that led to successful outcomes in high-performing LHDs. Specific context + mechanism = outcomes stories are reported.
We found that successful LHDs defined priority groups, communicated with the public, maintained adequate staffing, established community partnerships, and maintained flexibility. We describe the specific contexts that triggered key mechanisms, which, when combined, led to successful outcomes.
The positive deviance and realist evaluation approach allowed us to understand how LHD context triggered specific mechanisms, which led to successful public clinics. The experience of successful LHDs can assist similar LHDs in implementing successful public vaccination clinics in the future.
在 2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间,地方卫生部门(LHD)负责向公众接种疫苗,但由于疫苗供应有限,他们在组织如此大规模的疫苗接种活动方面经验相对较少,指导也相对较少。他们使用各种流程向公众提供疫苗。从成功开展公众疫苗接种活动的 LHD 中吸取经验教训,可以为今后的疫苗接种工作提供参考。
从 H1N1 流感大流行中吸取经验教训,以便为今后类似事件做好应对准备。我们采用正向偏离方法,在 2009 年 H1N1 流感疫苗接种活动中确定了表现出色的 LHD 作为正偏离。然后,我们采用现实主义评估方法,了解导致特定 LHD 表现出色的背景和机制组合。
本项目是一项回顾性定性研究。我们使用流程映射来定义实施公众疫苗接种诊所所涉及的步骤。我们确定了在 H1N1 公众疫苗接种工作中的正偏离,并对 LHD 工作人员进行深入访谈,以了解导致成功的公众疫苗接种诊所的背景和机制。
本研究主要关注在 2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间实施公众疫苗接种诊所的 LHD 疫苗接种工作中的正偏离。
研究结果侧重于导致表现出色的 LHD 取得成功的背景和机制的组合。报道了具体的背景+机制=结果故事。
我们发现,成功的 LHD 确定了优先群体,与公众进行了沟通,保持了充足的人员配备,建立了社区伙伴关系,并保持了灵活性。我们描述了触发关键机制的具体背景,这些机制结合起来导致了成功的结果。
正向偏离和现实主义评估方法使我们能够了解 LHD 背景如何触发特定机制,从而导致成功的公众诊所。成功的 LHD 的经验可以帮助类似的 LHD 在未来实施成功的公众疫苗接种诊所。