Martin Erika G, Begany Grace M
Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York, and Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Department of Informatics, University at Albany, State University of New York, and Department of Business and Information Technology, State University of New York at Cobleskill, NY, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):345-351. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw076.
Government agencies are rapidly developing web portals to proactively publish "open" data that are searchable, available in nonproprietary formats, and with unlimited use and distribution rights. In this dynamic environment, we aimed to understand the experiences of 2 early leaders in open health data, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the New York State Department of Health.
Semistructured interviews with 40 practitioners and policymakers elicited value propositions, capabilities required for successful open data programs, and strategies for improving impact and sustainability. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to identify common perspectives and divergent viewpoints.
Respondents were optimistic about the value of open data, reporting numerous opportunities to advance the triple aim of lower costs, improved health care quality, and better population health. Benefits to agencies include enhanced data quality and more efficient operations. External benefits include improved health literacy, data-driven changes in health care delivery, consumer engagement, and community empowerment. Key challenges are resources, cultural resistance, navigating legal and regulatory issues, and data quality.
The open data movement will likely continue, but success requires sustained leadership, resources, organizational cultural change, promotion of data use, and governance. Jurisdictions that are initiating open data programs can incorporate these lessons from early innovators.
The open data movement has a bright future but unknown long-term impact. To maintain momentum, important directions for the field include reconsidering legal guidance on protecting health data in the open data era and quantifying the return on investment.
政府机构正在迅速开发门户网站,以主动发布“开放”数据,这些数据可搜索、以非专有格式提供,并且具有无限制的使用和传播权利。在这种动态环境下,我们旨在了解开放健康数据领域的两位早期领导者,即美国卫生与公众服务部和纽约州卫生部的经验。
对40名从业者和政策制定者进行半结构化访谈,以引出价值主张、成功的开放数据项目所需的能力,以及提高影响力和可持续性的策略。使用扎根理论方法分析访谈记录,以确定共同观点和不同观点。
受访者对开放数据的价值持乐观态度,报告了实现降低成本、提高医疗质量和改善人群健康这三重目标的众多机会。对机构的好处包括提高数据质量和提高运营效率。外部好处包括提高健康素养、医疗服务提供方面的数据驱动变革、消费者参与和社区赋权。关键挑战包括资源、文化阻力、应对法律和监管问题以及数据质量。
开放数据运动可能会持续下去,但成功需要持续的领导、资源、组织文化变革、促进数据使用和治理。正在启动开放数据项目的司法管辖区可以借鉴这些早期创新者的经验教训。
开放数据运动前景光明,但长期影响未知。为保持发展势头,该领域的重要方向包括重新考虑开放数据时代保护健康数据的法律指导,以及量化投资回报率。