Department of Spine Osteopathia, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China.
PLoS One. 2013 May 27;8(5):e63867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063867. Print 2013.
A retrospective study of intradural extramedullary schwannoma.
The purpose of this study was to compare treatment results in the differential surgery of intradural extramedullary schwannoma.
A reference guide to the surgical procedures available to treat intradural extramedullary schwannoma has not yet been established.
The study retrospectively reviewed 110 patients: Group A: laminectomy+microscopic excision; Group B: hemilaminectomy+microscopic excision; Group C: laminectomy+microscopic excision+pedicle screw fixation. Researchers selected patients for this retrospective review by applying the following criteria: 1) back pain spread out from the tumor level, sensory and motor loss; 2) treatment by surgery; 3) clinical diagnosis made by physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pathology; 4) a minimum clinical and radiologic follow-up of 12 months. The clinical outcomes were assessed by comparing the Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association Scores (JOA score). The study also performed a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cervical vertebrae: The estimated blood loss in Group B was significantly less than in Group C (P<0.05) (Table 1). Thoracic vertebrae: The duration of hospital stay and estimated blood loss in Group A was significantly less than in Group C (P<0.05) (Table 2, 3). Lumbar vertebrae: The resection rate in Group C was significantly higher than in Group A and Group B (P<0.05) (Table 4). Treatment in Group B was the least expensive, and therefore, the most cost-effective.
In the case of appropriate surgical indications, the study suggests that hemilaminectomy+microscopic excision is advantageous in the removal of cervical schwannoma, and that laminectomy+microscopic excision is advantageous in the removal of thoracic schwannoma; lumbar intradural extramedullary schwannoma can be managed by laminectomy+microscopic excision+pedicle screw fixation.
硬脊膜外神经鞘瘤的回顾性研究。
本研究旨在比较硬脊膜外神经鞘瘤的不同手术治疗效果。
尚未建立治疗硬脊膜外神经鞘瘤的手术方法参考指南。
本研究回顾性分析了 110 例患者:A 组:椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术;B 组:半椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术;C 组:椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术+椎弓根螺钉固定术。研究人员通过以下标准选择接受回顾性分析的患者:1)肿瘤水平以下背痛扩散,感觉和运动丧失;2)手术治疗;3)体格检查、磁共振成像(MRI)和病理学临床诊断;4)临床和影像学随访至少 12 个月。通过比较视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和日本矫形协会评分(JOA 评分)评估临床结果。本研究还进行了成本效益分析。
颈椎:B 组的估计失血量明显少于 C 组(P<0.05)(表 1)。胸椎:A 组的住院时间和估计失血量明显少于 C 组(P<0.05)(表 2、3)。腰椎:C 组的切除率明显高于 A 组和 B 组(P<0.05)(表 4)。B 组的治疗费用最低,因此最具成本效益。
在适当的手术适应证下,研究表明半椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术有利于颈椎神经鞘瘤的切除,椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术有利于胸段神经鞘瘤的切除;腰椎硬脊膜外神经鞘瘤可通过椎板切除术+显微镜下切除术+椎弓根螺钉固定术进行治疗。