1 The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , Bethesda, Maryland.
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Nov 15;30(22):1852-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2938. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
To accelerate data sharing and research on traumatic brain injury (TBI), several federal agencies have been collaborating to support the development and implementation of common data elements (CDEs). The first recommendations for CDEs were made in 2010, and were well suited for hospital-based studies of acute TBI in adults. To broaden the utility of the TBI CDEs, experts were asked to update the recommendations to make them relevant to all ages, levels of injury severity, and phases of recovery. The second version of the TBI CDEs (v.2) was organized around four major study types: 1) epidemiological research; 2) studies on acute, hospitalized patients; 3) studies of the rehabilitation for moderate/severe TBI; and 4) mild TBI/concussion research. Given the heterogeneity of TBI, only a small set of core CDEs were found to be relevant across all study types. However, within groups, a much larger set of highly relevant CDEs were identified, and these were called basic CDEs. In addition, an expanded number of supplemental CDEs were specified and recommended for use depending upon the study goals. Version 2 provides a rich data dictionary for TBI research with about 900 CDEs. Many of the CDEs overlap across the study types, which will facilitate comparisons and meta-analysis across studies. Further modifications of the CDEs should be based on evaluation of their usefulness following implementation across a range of studies.
为了加速创伤性脑损伤(TBI)相关数据的共享和研究,几家联邦机构一直在合作,以支持共同数据元素(CDE)的开发和实施。首批 CDE 建议于 2010 年提出,非常适合用于成人急性 TBI 的基于医院的研究。为了拓宽 TBI CDE 的用途,专家们被要求更新建议,使其与所有年龄段、损伤严重程度水平和恢复阶段相关。TBI CDE 的第二版(v.2)围绕四种主要研究类型组织:1)流行病学研究;2)急性住院患者研究;3)中重度 TBI 康复研究;以及 4)轻度 TBI/脑震荡研究。鉴于 TBI 的异质性,只有一小部分核心 CDE 被发现与所有研究类型都相关。然而,在各组内,确定了更多高度相关的 CDE,并将其称为基本 CDE。此外,根据研究目标,还指定并推荐了更多补充 CDE 以供使用。版本 2 为 TBI 研究提供了一个丰富的数据字典,其中包含约 900 个 CDE。许多 CDE 在研究类型之间存在重叠,这将有助于在研究之间进行比较和荟萃分析。CDE 的进一步修改应基于在一系列研究中实施后的有用性评估。