• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decoding YouTube: An In-depth Analysis of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Videos and Their Implications for Patient Education.解读YouTube:对活体供肾移植视频的深入分析及其对患者教育的意义
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Oct 19;70:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube.评估在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享的心肺复苏术视频的可靠性、实用性和信息质量。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Sep;23(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation.关于半月板撕裂康复的YouTube视频的视频质量和可靠性评估。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36299. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36299. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
6
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of the reliability and educational quality of YouTube™ videos on sport nutrition topics.评估关于运动营养主题的 YouTube™ 视频的可靠性和教育质量。
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2023 Dec;20(1):2278632. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2023.2278632. Epub 2023 Nov 12.
8
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
9
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Hepatosteatosis.将YouTube视频作为肝脂肪变性信息来源的评估
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46843. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions.评估YouTube作为半月板斜韧带损伤信息来源的可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):23259671231219815. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219815. eCollection 2024 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
An assessment of the quality and readability level of online content on urinary tract infection treatment in Spanish and English.对西班牙语和英语中关于尿路感染治疗的在线内容的质量和可读性水平的评估。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jul 30;14(7):1959-1977. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-221. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological Impact of Living Kidney Donation: A Systematic Review by the EAU-YAU Kidney Transplant Working Group.活体肾脏捐赠的心理影响:EAU-YAU 肾脏移植工作组的系统评价。
Transpl Int. 2023 Nov 24;36:11827. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11827. eCollection 2023.
2
Publisher Accreditation Fails to Reflect Higher Content Quality in Liver Transplant YouTube Videos.出版商认证未能反映肝移植 YouTube 视频的更高内容质量。
J Surg Res. 2024 Jan;293:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
A cross-sectional study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool.一项关于YouTube®上与拇外翻相关视频的可靠性和质量的横断面研究以及新开发的拇外翻特异性调查工具的评估。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231171239. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171239. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Open versus robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: A systematic review by the European Association of Urology (EAU) - Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Kidney Transplant Working Group.开放与机器人辅助肾移植:欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)-青年泌尿外科医生(YAU)肾脏移植工作组的系统评价。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Oct;47(8):474-487. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
5
Assessment of Understandability and Actionability of YouTube Videos on Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn.关于新生儿溶血病的YouTube视频的可理解性与可操作性评估
Cureus. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):e33724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33724. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Urologists and Kidney Transplantation: The First European Census.泌尿外科医生与肾脏移植:首次欧洲普查
Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):336-337. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.032. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
7
Analyzing the quality and validity of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) videos on social media.分析社交媒体上钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)视频的质量和有效性。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):226-231. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.107758. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
YouTube as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis.YouTube作为膀胱疼痛综合征信息来源的当代分析
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Jan;41(1):237-245. doi: 10.1002/nau.24802. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
YouTube: A good source for retrograde intrarenal surgery?YouTube:逆行性肾内手术的良好资源?
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Mar;62(2):180-185. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200314.
10
Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website.咨询“Dr. YouTube”:对热门视频分享网站上的尿道下裂视频的客观评估。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):70.e1-70.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

解读YouTube:对活体供肾移植视频的深入分析及其对患者教育的意义

Decoding YouTube: An In-depth Analysis of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Videos and Their Implications for Patient Education.

作者信息

Haberal Hakan Bahadir, Piana Alberto, Pecoraro Alessio, Bañuelos Marco Beatriz, Prudhomme Thomas, López-Abad Alicia, Casadevall Rubau Marta, Donmez Muhammet Irfan, Breda Alberto, Territo Angelo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Oct 19;70:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.005
PMID:39497749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11533573/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

YouTube is an open online video platform that both patients and health care professionals use to access information. Our aim was to evaluate the quality of videos related to living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) on YouTube.

METHODS

Research was conducted using the keywords "living donor kidney transplant" and "kidney transplant". We evaluated videos with more than 10 000 views and excluded those not in English. A total of 58 videos met the criteria for inclusion in the evaluation. We used the modified DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark score, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and educational value.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The quality of the videos was low, with a median DISCERN score of 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-2), JAMA score of 1 (IQR 1-2), and GQS of 2 (IQR 1-3). The majority of the videos were of North American origin (75.9%) and focused on the patient experience (51.7%). The scores for patient experience videos were significantly lower than for other videos according to all three scoring systems ( < 0.001). Videos uploaded by medical centers and private physicians/nurses had significantly higher scores than videos uploaded by patients or by TV shows/programs. Evaluation of only videos with English audio is a limitation of the study.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Assessment of YouTube videos presenting information on LDKT revealed low quality. Health care organizations should create online resources and share them on social media platforms.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at the quality of YouTube videos on kidney transplantation using a kidney from a living donor. We found that the information presented in YouTube videos on this topic is of low quality.

摘要

背景与目的

YouTube是一个开放的在线视频平台,患者和医疗保健专业人员都可借此获取信息。我们的目的是评估YouTube上与活体供肾移植(LDKT)相关视频的质量。

方法

使用关键词“活体供肾移植”和“肾移植”进行研究。我们评估了观看次数超过10000次的视频,并排除了非英语视频。共有58个视频符合纳入评估的标准。我们使用改良的DISCERN工具、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准评分和全球质量评分(GQS)来评估质量、准确性和教育价值。

主要发现与局限性

视频质量较低,DISCERN评分中位数为1(四分位间距[IQR]1 - 2),JAMA评分为1(IQR 1 - 2),GQS为2(IQR 1 - 3)。大多数视频来自北美(75.9%),且聚焦于患者体验(51.7%)。根据所有三种评分系统,患者体验视频的得分显著低于其他视频(<0.001)。由医疗中心和私人医生/护士上传的视频得分显著高于患者或电视节目上传的视频。仅评估有英语音频的视频是本研究的一个局限性。

结论与临床意义

对YouTube上呈现LDKT信息的视频评估显示质量较低。医疗保健组织应创建在线资源并在社交媒体平台上分享。

患者总结

我们查看了YouTube上关于使用活体供肾进行肾移植的视频质量。我们发现YouTube上关于这个主题的视频所提供的信息质量较低。