Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.058. Epub 2013 May 30.
We performed a meta-analysis to compare treatment with α-blockers and anticholinergics (ie combination therapy) to α-blocker monotherapy to clarify the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach among men with storage urinary symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
We searched for trials of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms that were randomized to combination treatment or α-blockers alone. We pooled data from 7 placebo controlled trials meeting inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes of interest included changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (storage subscores) and urinary frequency. We also assessed post-void residual volume, maximal flow rate and the incidence of urinary retention. Data were pooled using random effects models for continuous outcomes and the Peto method to generate odds ratios for acute urinary retention.
Combination therapy had a significantly greater reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score storage subscores (Δ -0.73, 95% CI -1.09 - -0.37) and voiding frequency (Δ -0.69 voids, 95% CI -0.97 - -0.41). There was also a greater reduction in maximal urinary flow rate (Δ -0.59 ml per second, 95% CI -1.04 - -0.14) and increase in post-void residual urine volume (Δ 11.60 ml, 95% CI 8.50-14.70) with combination therapy. The number needed to treat with combination therapy to cause 1 acute urinary retention episode was 101 (95% CI 60-267).
Combination treatment with α-blockers and anticholinergics significantly improved storage voiding parameters compared to men treated with α-blocker therapy alone. This treatment approach is safe with a minimal risk of increased post-void residual urine volume, decreased maximal urinary flow rate or acute urinary retention.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了 α 受体阻滞剂和抗胆碱能药物(即联合治疗)与 α 受体阻滞剂单药治疗治疗与良性前列腺增生相关的储存期尿路症状男性的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了与良性前列腺增生/下尿路症状相关的男性试验,这些试验随机分为联合治疗或 α 受体阻滞剂单药治疗。我们对符合纳入标准的 7 项安慰剂对照试验的数据进行了汇总。主要观察终点包括国际前列腺症状评分(储存亚评分)和排尿频率的变化。我们还评估了残余尿量、最大尿流率和尿潴留的发生率。对于连续结果,我们使用随机效应模型进行数据汇总,对于急性尿潴留,我们使用 Peto 方法生成比值比。
联合治疗组在国际前列腺症状评分储存亚评分(Δ-0.73,95%CI-1.09- -0.37)和排尿频率(Δ-0.69 次,95%CI-0.97- -0.41)方面有显著的改善。最大尿流率(Δ-0.59ml/s,95%CI-1.04- -0.14)也有更大的降低,残余尿量(Δ11.60ml,95%CI8.50-14.70)增加。联合治疗的急性尿潴留发生率为 101 例(95%CI60-267),需要治疗的人数为 101 例。
与单独使用 α 受体阻滞剂治疗相比,α 受体阻滞剂和抗胆碱能药物联合治疗可显著改善储存期排尿参数。这种治疗方法是安全的,残余尿量增加、最大尿流率降低或急性尿潴留的风险最小。