Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayamashi, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1383-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 May 30.
To compare therapeutic effect, adverse events, and embolized hepatic artery impairment in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization between Lipiodol plus insoluble gelatin sponge particles (Gelpart) and Lipiodol plus 2-day-soluble gelatin sponge particles (2DS-GSPs).
In a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned to the 2DS-GSP group or the Gelpart group. Radiographic response at 3 months per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors was evaluated as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were safety (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) within 3 months and hepatic branch artery impairment at the time of repeat chemoembolization (grade 0, no damage; grade I, mild vessel wall irregularity; grade II, overt stenosis; grade III, occlusion of more peripheral branch artery than subsegmental artery; grade IV, occlusion of subsegmental artery). Grade II, III, or IV indicated significant hepatic artery impairment.
Thirty-seven patients with 143 nodules were randomized to the 2DS-GSP group and 36 patients with 137 nodules were randomized to the Gelpart group. No significant differences in patient background existed between groups. Target lesion response and overall tumor response in the 2DS-GSP and Gelpart groups were 77.7% versus 76.9% and 78.3% versus 77.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. No significant difference in adverse events existed between groups. Hepatic artery impairment was observed in 5% of patients in the 2DS-GSP group (n = 32) and in 16% in the Gelpart group (n = 33; P< .001).
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with 2DS-GSPs resulted in the same therapeutic and adverse effects as chemoembolization with Gelpart while causing significantly less hepatic artery impairment.
比较载碘油超液化明胶海绵微球(2DS-GSP)与载碘油不溶性明胶海绵微球(Gelpart)行 TACE 治疗的疗效、不良反应及栓塞后肝动脉损伤情况。
采用单中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验设计,将肝癌患者分为 2DS-GSP 组和 Gelpart 组。以改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)评价 3 个月时的肿瘤反应为主要终点;次要终点为 3 个月内的安全性(采用不良事件通用术语标准 4.0 版)和再次 TACE 时的肝动脉分支损伤(0 级,无损伤;1 级,轻度血管壁不规则;2 级,明显狭窄;3 级,末梢分支动脉以外的分支动脉闭塞;4 级,亚段动脉闭塞)。2 级、3 级或 4 级提示明显的肝动脉损伤。
143 个病灶的 37 例患者被随机分入 2DS-GSP 组,137 个病灶的 36 例患者被随机分入 Gelpart 组。两组患者的基线资料无显著差异。2DS-GSP 组和 Gelpart 组的靶病灶反应和总体肿瘤反应分别为 77.7%和 76.9%、78.3%和 77.8%,差异均无统计学意义。两组不良反应发生率无显著差异。2DS-GSP 组 5%(32/628)的患者和 Gelpart 组 16%(33/205)的患者发生肝动脉损伤(P<.001)。
与 Gelpart 相比,2DS-GSP 行 TACE 治疗的疗效和不良反应相当,但肝动脉损伤发生率显著降低。