Gwon Dong Il, Chu Hee Ho, Kim Gun Ha, Kim Jihoon, Im Byoung Soo, Ko Eunbyeol, Kim Jeongyeon, Kim Jin Hyoung, Ko Gi-Young, Yoon Hyun-Ki
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11527-y.
To compare the therapeutic effect, adverse events, and hepatic artery injury (HAI) between gelatin spheres (GS) and nonspherical gelatin sponge particles (GP) in conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE).
A total of 368 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent C-TACE between September 2019 and May 2021 were included in this single center retrospective study. Adverse events, radiologic tumor response, local tumor recurrence, and HAI were evaluated.
Subsegmental C-TACE was performed using biodegradable GS in 165 patients and nonspherical biodegradable GP in 203 patients. No significant differences in patient background existed between the groups, and there was no significant difference in adverse event rate (p = 0.231). The CR and overall tumor response in the GS and GP groups were 73.3% vs 70.9%, and 99.4% vs 98.5%, respectively, with no significant between-group differences (p = 0.642 and p = 0.631). No significant difference in cumulative local tumor recurrence rate existed between the groups (p = 0.558). HAI was observed in 16% (20 of 125 patients) in the GS group and 37.4% (49 of 131 patients) in the GP group. The incidence of HAI was significantly higher in the GP group than in the GS group (p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, risk factors for HAI were index tumor size ≥ 3 cm (p = 0.001) and use of GP (p < 0.001).
C-TACE with GS resulted in the same therapeutic and adverse effects as C-TACE with nonspherical GP while causing significantly less HAI.
Question Comparisons between GS and nonspherical GP are lacking, and the potential advantages of GS over nonspherical GP are not well studied. Findings HAI incidence was higher in the GP than the GS group, and risk factors of HAI were index tumor size ≥ 3 cm and GP use. Clinical relevance C-TACE with GS resulted in the same therapeutic and adverse effects as C-TACE with nonspherical GP while causing significantly less HAI.
比较明胶球(GS)与非球形明胶海绵颗粒(GP)在传统经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(C-TACE)中的治疗效果、不良事件及肝动脉损伤(HAI)情况。
本单中心回顾性研究纳入了2019年9月至2021年5月期间连续接受C-TACE治疗的368例肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。评估不良事件、影像学肿瘤反应、局部肿瘤复发及HAI情况。
165例患者使用可生物降解的GS进行亚段C-TACE,203例患者使用非球形可生物降解的GP。两组患者的背景无显著差异,不良事件发生率也无显著差异(p = 0.231)。GS组和GP组的完全缓解(CR)率及总体肿瘤反应率分别为73.3%对70.9%,99.4%对98.5%,组间无显著差异(p = 0.642和p = 0.631)。两组间累积局部肿瘤复发率无显著差异(p = 0.558)。GS组16%(125例患者中的2例)出现HAI,GP组37.4%(131例患者中的49例)出现HAI。GP组HAI的发生率显著高于GS组(p < 0.001)。在多因素logistic回归分析中,HAI的危险因素为肿瘤指数大小≥3 cm(p = 0.001)及使用GP(p < 0.001)。
GS用于C-TACE的治疗效果和不良事件与非球形GP用于C-TACE相同,但HAI显著更少。
问题:缺乏GS与非球形GP之间的比较,且GS相对于非球形GP的潜在优势未得到充分研究。发现:GP组的HAI发生率高于GS组,HAI的危险因素为肿瘤指数大小≥3 cm及使用GP。临床意义:GS用于C-TACE的治疗效果和不良事件与非球形GP用于C-TACE相同,但HAI显著更少。