Dal Bello-Haas Vanina, Florence Julaine M
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD005229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005229.pub3.
Despite the high incidence of muscle weakness in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or motor neuron disease (MND), the effects of exercise in this population are not well understood. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.
To systematically review randomised and quasi-randomised studies of exercise for people with ALS or MND.
We searched The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (2 July 2012), CENTRAL (2012, Issue 6 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2012), AMED (January 1985 to June 2012), CINAHL Plus (January 1938 to June 2012), LILACS (January 1982 to June 2012), Ovid HealthSTAR (January 1975 to December 2012). We also searched ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I (2007 to 2012), inspected the reference lists of all papers selected for review and contacted authors with expertise in the field.
We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of people with a diagnosis of definite, probable, probable with laboratory support, or possible ALS, as defined by the El Escorial criteria. We included progressive resistance or strengthening exercise, and endurance or aerobic exercise. The control condition was no exercise or standard rehabilitation management. Our primary outcome measure was improvement in functional ability, decrease in disability or reduction in rate of decline as measured by a validated outcome tool at three months. Our secondary outcome measures were improvement in psychological status or quality of life, decrease in fatigue, increase in, or reduction in rate of decline of muscle strength (strengthening or resistance studies), increase in, or reduction in rate of decline of aerobic endurance (aerobic or endurance studies) at three months and frequency of adverse effects. We did not exclude studies on the basis of measurement of outcomes.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data. We collected adverse event data from included trials. The review authors contacted the authors of the included studies to obtain information not available in the published articles.
We identified two randomised controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria, and we found no new trials when we updated the searches in 2012. The first, a study with overall unclear risk of bias, examined the effects of a twice-daily exercise program of moderate load endurance exercise versus "usual activities" in 25 people with ALS. The second, a study with overall low risk of bias, examined the effects of thrice weekly moderate load and moderate intensity resistance exercises compared to usual care (stretching exercises) in 27 people with ALS. After three months, when the results of the two trials were combined (43 participants), there was a significant mean improvement in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) measure of function in favour of the exercise groups (mean difference 3.21, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 5.96). No statistically significant differences in quality of life, fatigue or muscle strength were found. In both trials adverse effects, investigators reported no adverse effects such as increased muscle cramping, muscle soreness or fatigue
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The included studies were too small to determine to what extent strengthening exercises for people with ALS are beneficial, or whether exercise is harmful. There is a complete lack of randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials examining aerobic exercise in this population. More research is needed.
尽管肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)或运动神经元病(MND)患者中肌肉无力的发生率很高,但运动对此类人群的影响尚未得到充分了解。这是对2008年首次发表的一篇综述的更新。
系统评价针对ALS或MND患者进行运动的随机和半随机研究。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组专业注册库(2012年7月2日)、Cochrane系统评价数据库(2012年第6期)、医学索引(1966年1月至2012年6月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年1月至2012年6月)、联合和补充健康护理文摘数据库(1985年1月至2012年6月)、护理学与健康领域数据库(1938年1月至2012年6月)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学数据库(1982年1月至2012年6月)、Ovid健康之星数据库(1975年1月至2012年12月)。我们还检索了ProQuest学位论文与学术期刊数据库(2007年至2012年),查阅了所有入选综述的论文的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家作者。
我们纳入了根据埃斯科里亚尔标准诊断为确诊、很可能、可能伴实验室支持或可能的ALS患者的随机或半随机对照试验。我们纳入了渐进性抗阻或强化运动以及耐力或有氧运动。对照条件为不运动或标准康复管理。我们的主要结局指标是三个月时通过有效结局工具测量的功能能力改善、残疾程度降低或下降速率减慢。我们的次要结局指标是三个月时心理状态或生活质量的改善、疲劳减轻、肌肉力量增加或下降速率减慢(强化或抗阻研究)、有氧耐力增加或下降速率减慢(有氧运动或耐力研究)以及不良反应的发生频率。我们没有基于结局测量排除研究。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们从纳入的试验中收集不良事件数据。综述作者联系了纳入研究的作者以获取已发表文章中未提供的信息。
我们确定了两项符合我们纳入标准的随机对照试验,并且在2012年更新检索时未发现新的试验。第一项研究的总体偏倚风险不明确,研究了25例ALS患者中每日两次的中等负荷耐力运动训练方案与“日常活动”相比的效果。第二项研究的总体偏倚风险较低,研究了27例ALS患者中每周三次的中等负荷和中等强度抗阻运动与常规护理(伸展运动)相比的效果。三个月后,当合并两项试验的结果(43名参与者)时,肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表(ALSFRS)的功能测量结果显示运动组有显著的平均改善(平均差值3.21,95%置信区间0.46至5.96)。在生活质量、疲劳或肌肉力量方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。在两项试验中,研究者均报告无不良反应,如肌肉痉挛增加、肌肉酸痛或疲劳。
纳入的研究规模太小,无法确定强化运动对ALS患者有益的程度,也无法确定运动是否有害。完全缺乏针对此类人群进行有氧运动的随机或半随机临床试验。需要更多的研究。