• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于超市货架的护理机器人:辅助技术中的产品缺口。

Care robots for the supermarket shelf: a product gap in assistive technologies.

作者信息

Blackman Tim

机构信息

School of Social Sciences , The Open University , UK .

出版信息

Ageing Soc. 2013 Jul;33(5):763-781. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X1200027X. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1017/S0144686X1200027X
PMID:23729915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3665953/
Abstract

The literature on the development of assistive robots is dominated by technological papers with little consideration of how such devices might be commercialised for a mass market at a price that is affordable for older people and their families as well as public services and care insurers. This article argues that the focus of technical development in this field is too ambitious, neglecting the potential market for an affordable device that is aleady in the realm of the 'adjacent possible' given current technology capabilities. It also questions on both ethical and marketing grounds the current effort to develop assistive robots with pet-like or human-like features. The marketing literature on 'really new products' has so far not appeared to inform the development of assistive robots but has some important lessons. These include using analogies with existing products and giving particular attention to the role of early adopters. Relevant analogies for care robots are not animals or humans but useful domestic appliances and personal technologies with attractive designs, engaging functionality and intuitive usability. This points to a strategy for enabling mass adoption - which has so far eluded even conventional telecare - of emphasising how such an appliance is part of older people's contemporary lifestyles rather than a sign of age-related decline and loss of independence.

摘要

关于辅助机器人发展的文献主要是技术论文,很少考虑如何将这类设备商业化以推向大众市场,使其价格对于老年人及其家庭、公共服务机构和护理保险公司来说是可以承受的。本文认为,该领域技术发展的重点过于雄心勃勃,忽视了鉴于当前技术能力,一款价格亲民的设备在“临近可能”范围内已有的潜在市场。同时,本文还从伦理和市场推广的角度,对当前开发具有宠物或人类特征的辅助机器人的努力提出质疑。关于“真正的新产品”的市场推广文献,迄今似乎并未为辅助机器人的开发提供参考,但却有一些重要的经验教训。这些经验教训包括借鉴现有产品的类比方法,并特别关注早期采用者的作用。护理机器人的相关类比对象不是动物或人类,而是设计吸引人、功能实用且易于操作的家用器具和个人技术产品。这指向了一种推动大规模采用的策略——即使是传统的远程护理迄今也未能做到这一点——即强调这样一种器具如何成为老年人现代生活方式的一部分,而不是与年龄相关的衰退和失去独立性的标志。

相似文献

1
Care robots for the supermarket shelf: a product gap in assistive technologies.用于超市货架的护理机器人:辅助技术中的产品缺口。
Ageing Soc. 2013 Jul;33(5):763-781. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X1200027X. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
2
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.辅助技术和远程监护以维持痴呆症患者的独立居家生活:ATTILA RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190.
3
Assessment of personal care and medical robots from older adults' perspective.从老年人的角度评估个人护理和医疗机器人。
Robotics Biomim. 2017;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40638-017-0061-7. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍社交辅助人形机器人在医疗和社会保健领域应用的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096.
5
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.老年人对辅助机器人的接受度:在生活实验室环境中进行为期 1 个月的人机交互混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014.
6
Intersections Between Systems Thinking and Market Shaping for Assistive Technology: The SMART (Systems-Market for Assistive and Related Technologies) Thinking Matrix.系统思维与辅助技术市场塑造的交集:SMART(辅助和相关技术的系统-市场)思维矩阵。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 23;15(12):2627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122627.
7
The Increasing Centrality of Robotic Technology in the Context of Nursing Care: Bioethical Implications Analyzed through a Scoping Review Approach.机器人技术在护理领域日益重要:通过范围综述方法分析其生物伦理影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Aug 28;2021:1478025. doi: 10.1155/2021/1478025. eCollection 2021.
8
"Are we ready for robots that care for us?" Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots.“我们准备好迎接照顾我们的机器人了吗?”老年人对社交辅助机器人的态度和看法。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141. eCollection 2015.
9
Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient 'users' and 'non-users'.探索影响英国剑桥郡采用并参与综合辅助远程医疗和远程护理服务决策的因素:一项针对患者“使用者”和“非使用者”的嵌套式定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 19;16:137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1379-5.
10
Shared autonomy in assistive mobile robots: a review.辅助移动机器人的共享自主性:综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug;18(6):827-848. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1928778. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic misinformation in dementia care: emotions as sense-making resources in residents' encounters with robot animals.痴呆症护理中的机器人错误信息:居民与机器动物互动中作为意义建构资源的情感
Front Sociol. 2024 Apr 8;9:1354978. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1354978. eCollection 2024.
2
The relationship between formal and informal care among Chinese older adults: based on the 2014 CLHLS dataset.中国老年人正式照料与非正式照料之间的关系:基于2014年中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)数据集
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 22;19(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4160-8.
3
Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies.弥合老年人的数字鸿沟:一项关于向老年人介绍新技术倡议的研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Jan 9;10:193-200. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S72399. eCollection 2015.
4
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.老年人对辅助机器人的接受度:在生活实验室环境中进行为期 1 个月的人机交互混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot.对医疗机器人的态度和反应。
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun;16(5):608-13. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0171.
2
'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users.“但显然不适合我”:机器人、实验室和老年测试用户的反抗性身份。
Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Feb 1;32(2):335-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
3
[Effects of a robot pet-assisted program for elderly people with dementia].[机器人宠物辅助项目对老年痴呆症患者的影响]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009 Aug;39(4):562-73. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.4.562.
4
Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly.社区老年人的孤独感、社会支持网络、情绪和幸福感。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;24(7):694-700. doi: 10.1002/gps.2181.
5
Personal resources supporting living at home as described by older home care clients.老年居家护理客户所描述的支持居家生活的个人资源。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2008 Aug;14(4):308-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00698.x.
6
Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs.养老院中的动物辅助疗法与孤独感:机器人狗与活狗的使用情况
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008 Mar;9(3):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007.
7
Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare.老年人对智能家居技术的看法:对医疗保健领域研究、政策及市场创新的启示
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:1810-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352665.
8
Social networks: a profile of the elderly who self-neglect.社交网络:自我忽视的老年人概况。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2006;18(4):35-49. doi: 10.1300/J084v18n04_05.
9
Places and health: a qualitative study to explore how older women living alone perceive the social and physical dimensions of their neighbourhoods.场所与健康:一项质性研究,旨在探究独居老年女性如何看待其邻里环境的社会和物质层面。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(6):1154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.031. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
10
The new rules for bringing innovations to market.将创新成果推向市场的新规则。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Mar;82(3):58-67, 126.