Lehrer M
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx.
Clin Lab Med. 1990 Jun;10(2):271-88.
Appropriate GC/MS analytical techniques can provide conclusive confirmatory evidence for the presence of drugs and metabolites in forensic urine drug testing. Although forensic laboratories are required to utilize GC/MS, they have flexibility in selecting instrumentation, modes of operation, and actual analytical methods. Because a laboratory's accreditation status, reputation, and economic well-being depend on consistently accurate results, it is important to use optimal analytical procedures so that reliability and accuracy are maximized. Pitfalls in conventional EI SIM techniques can lead to high rates of false-positive and false-negative results. Different mass spectrometric operating modes such as CI and full-scan can be used to complement SIM analyses. These modes are useful in solving difficult identification problems and in enhancing both specificity and sensitivity. Newer types of GC/MS systems based on ion trapping offer the promise of technologic advances in enhanced analytical performance and productivity gains. Knowledge of the advantages and potential pitfalls of different GC/MS systems as well as different ionization and detection modes is helpful in optimizing the accuracy of compound identification.
合适的气相色谱/质谱联用(GC/MS)分析技术可为法医尿液药物检测中药物及代谢物的存在提供确凿的确认证据。尽管法医实验室被要求使用GC/MS,但他们在选择仪器设备、操作模式及实际分析方法方面具有灵活性。由于实验室的认可状态、声誉及经济状况取决于始终如一的准确结果,因此采用最佳分析程序以使可靠性和准确性最大化非常重要。传统电子轰击单离子监测(EI SIM)技术中的陷阱可能导致高比例的假阳性和假阴性结果。不同的质谱操作模式,如化学电离(CI)和全扫描,可以用来补充单离子监测分析。这些模式在解决困难的鉴定问题以及提高特异性和灵敏度方面很有用。基于离子阱的新型GC/MS系统有望在增强分析性能和提高生产力方面取得技术进步。了解不同GC/MS系统以及不同电离和检测模式的优势和潜在陷阱,有助于优化化合物鉴定的准确性。