• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《外科领域当前的争论——印度外科医生的横断面研究》

Current Debates in Surgery - A Cross Sectional Study amongst Indian Surgeons.

作者信息

Khandelwal Rohan, Agarwal Brij B

机构信息

VMMC Safdarjang Hospital, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and Association of Surgeons of India, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):213-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0585-6. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s12262-012-0585-6
PMID:23730046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3397184/
Abstract

Surgery like all fields of medicine is evolving rapidly and these new techniques are challenging to replace the existing 'standard of care'. Though some of these advances are here to stay, many of them are driven by a handful of surgeons influenced by market forces. In some controversial topics, there is a problem of plenty and it is difficult for a general surgeon to choose from the various options available. In order to address some of these contentious issues, a cross sectional, questionnaire based study was designed. The questionnaire was posted to surgeons across the country and it included 11 questions (single best answer format) on the current debates in surgery. The questionnaire was answered by 778 surgeons and gave rise to interesting observations. The practice of surgery is an interplay of patient- surgeon and market forces and more comprehensive studies are required to address these controversial topics in surgery.

摘要

与所有医学领域一样,外科手术正在迅速发展,而这些新技术正面临着取代现有“护理标准”的挑战。尽管其中一些进展会持续存在,但许多进展是由少数受市场力量影响的外科医生推动的。在一些有争议的话题上,存在过多选择的问题,普通外科医生很难从各种可用选项中做出选择。为了解决其中一些有争议的问题,设计了一项基于问卷调查的横断面研究。问卷被发送给全国各地的外科医生,其中包括11个关于当前外科手术辩论的问题(单项最佳答案格式)。778名外科医生回答了问卷,得出了有趣的观察结果。外科手术实践是患者、外科医生和市场力量相互作用的结果,需要更全面的研究来解决外科手术中的这些争议性话题。

相似文献

1
Current Debates in Surgery - A Cross Sectional Study amongst Indian Surgeons.《外科领域当前的争论——印度外科医生的横断面研究》
Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):213-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0585-6. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
2
Do Surgeons Treat Their Patients Like They Would Treat Themselves?外科医生对待患者会像对待自己一样吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3564-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4304-z.
3
Trauma care in German-speaking countries: have changes in the curricula led to changes in practice after 10 years?德语国家的创伤护理:课程的变化在十年后是否导致了实践的改变?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0894-3. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
4
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
5
Variation in Spine Surgeon Selection Criteria Between Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery Patients.神经外科和骨科手术患者对脊柱外科医生选择标准的差异。
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;31(2):E127-E132. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000576.
6
Survey of French spine surgeons reveals significant variability in spine trauma practices in 2013.2013年对法国脊柱外科医生的调查显示,脊柱创伤治疗方法存在显著差异。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.018. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
What Does the Average Person Know About Endocrine and Vascular Surgeons?一般人对内分泌和血管外科医生了解多少?
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:348-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.056. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Comparison of General Surgical Practice Size and Setting in 2017 vs 2013 in the US.2017 年与 2013 年美国普通外科手术实践规模和环境的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216848. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6848.
9
Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An International Perspective.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:国际视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1826-1834. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294.
10
Patient preference for coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed on the arrested or beating heart: a questionnaire study.患者对停跳或不停跳心脏冠状动脉旁路移植术的偏好:一项问卷调查研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Dec;40(6):1282-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Perspectives of Open vs. Laparoscopic Approaches to Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy: A Comprehensive Review.开放手术与腹腔镜手术行胰体尾空肠吻合术的外科视角:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Jan 6;16(1):e51769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51769. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Editorial: Ten Commandments of Safe and Optimum Abdominal Wall Closure.社论:安全且最佳腹壁缝合的十条准则
Indian J Surg. 2018 Apr;80(2):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s12262-018-1776-6. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Fast Track Surgery-Minimizing Side Effects of Surgery.快速康复外科——将手术副作用降至最低
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):753-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1451-8. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照试验比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182192f89.
2
Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?腹腔镜胆囊切除术后 4 年女性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后美容效果评估:是否存在问题?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2574-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1589-1. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
3
The power of social networking in medicine.社交网络在医学领域的影响力。
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Oct;27(10):888-90. doi: 10.1038/nbt1009-888.
4
Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:历史不应重演。
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1020-1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9951-3.
5
Calling all patients.呼叫所有患者。
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Sep;26(9):953. doi: 10.1038/nbt0908-953.
6
Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的长期疗效
Arch Surg. 2007 Jun;142(6):562-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562.
7
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝试验的荟萃分析支持使用腹膜前补片假体进行开放疝修补术。
Am J Surg. 2002 Jul;184(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00878-4.
8
Committed to kids: an integrated, 4-level team approach to weight management in adolescents.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3 Suppl):S81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90429-3.
9
Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery: who benefits?筋膜下内镜交通静脉手术:谁能从中获益?
Semin Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;15(1):39-49.
10
Training health professionals: a multidisciplinary team approach in a university-based weight-loss program.培训健康专业人员:基于大学的减肥项目中的多学科团队方法。
J Allied Health. 1999 Winter;28(4):226-9.