Tov William, Ng Kok Leong, Lin Han, Qiu Lin
Singapore Management University.
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1069-78. doi: 10.1037/a0033007. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Two studies evaluated the correspondence between self-reported well-being and codings of emotion and life content by the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC; Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis, 2011). Open-ended diary responses were collected from 206 participants daily for 3 weeks (Study 1) and from 139 participants twice a week for 8 weeks (Study 2). LIWC negative emotion consistently correlated with self-reported negative emotion. LIWC positive emotion correlated with self-reported positive emotion in Study 1 but not in Study 2. No correlations were observed with global life satisfaction. Using a co-occurrence coding method to combine LIWC emotion codings with life-content codings, we estimated the frequency of positive and negative events in 6 life domains (family, friends, academics, health, leisure, and money). Domain-specific event frequencies predicted self-reported satisfaction in all domains in Study 1 but not consistently in Study 2. We suggest that the correspondence between LIWC codings and self-reported well-being is affected by the number of writing samples collected per day as well as the target period (e.g., past day vs. past week) assessed by the self-report measure. Extensions and possible implications for the analyses of similar types of open-ended data (e.g., social media messages) are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
两项研究评估了自我报告的幸福感与通过语言调查和单词计数(LIWC;Pennebaker、Booth和Francis,2011)对情绪和生活内容进行编码之间的对应关系。研究1中,每天从206名参与者那里收集开放式日记回复,持续3周;研究2中,每周从139名参与者那里收集两次开放式日记回复,持续8周。LIWC消极情绪与自我报告的消极情绪始终相关。在研究1中,LIWC积极情绪与自我报告的积极情绪相关,但在研究2中并非如此。未观察到与总体生活满意度的相关性。使用共现编码方法将LIWC情绪编码与生活内容编码相结合,我们估计了6个生活领域(家庭、朋友、学业、健康、休闲和金钱)中积极和消极事件的频率。特定领域的事件频率在研究1中预测了所有领域的自我报告满意度,但在研究2中并非始终如此。我们认为,LIWC编码与自我报告的幸福感之间的对应关系受到每天收集的写作样本数量以及自我报告测量所评估的目标时间段(例如,过去一天与过去一周)的影响。讨论了对类似类型的开放式数据(例如,社交媒体消息)分析的扩展和可能的影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2013美国心理学会,保留所有权利)