Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的临终关怀:一项MADIT-II子研究

End-of-life care in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a MADIT-II substudy.

作者信息

Sherazi Saadia, McNitt Scott, Aktas Mehmet K, Polonsky Bronislava, Shah Abrar H, Moss Arthur J, Daubert James P, Zareba Wojciech

机构信息

Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;36(10):1273-9. doi: 10.1111/pace.12188. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-delivered shocks can cause substantial distress, warranting consideration of ICD deactivation at end of life. This study was designed to describe the patterns of end-of-life management in patients with ICDs.

METHODS

There was a retrospective chart review of 98 patients who died in the ICD arm of multicenter automated defibrillator implantation trial II (MADIT II). The pattern of ICD management and the frequency of ICD shocks delivered before death were reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified three groups: Group 1 consisting of individuals who underwent ICD, deactivation, 15 (15%); Group 2 patients without ICD deactivation who were in hospice or with "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders, 36 (37%); and Group 3 patients without ICD deactivation who were not in hospice care and did not have DNR orders, 47 (48%). Out of 15 deactivations, 11 (73%) occurred in the week before death. None of the patients in Group 1 received an ICD shock in the 24-hour period before death. However, one (3%) patient from Group 2 and nine (19%) patients from Group 3 had shocks during the 24 hours before death (P = 0.03). In the last week before death, three (20%), two (6%), and six (13%) patients received ICD shocks in the three groups, respectively (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with terminal conditions who are at risk for imminent death, active management of the patient's ICD, including timely discussions regarding ICD deactivation, may reduce the risk of ICD shocks during the end of life.

摘要

背景

植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)放电可导致严重不适,因此在生命末期有必要考虑停用ICD。本研究旨在描述ICD患者的临终管理模式。

方法

对多中心自动除颤器植入试验II(MADIT II)ICD组中死亡的98例患者进行回顾性病历审查。回顾了ICD管理模式以及死亡前ICD放电的频率。

结果

我们确定了三组:第1组由接受ICD停用的个体组成,共15例(15%);第2组为未停用ICD但处于临终关怀或有“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的患者,共36例(37%);第3组为未停用ICD且未接受临终关怀且无DNR医嘱的患者,共47例(48%)。在15例停用病例中,11例(73%)发生在死亡前一周。第1组患者在死亡前24小时内均未接受ICD放电。然而,第2组中有1例(3%)患者和第3组中有9例(19%)患者在死亡前24小时内接受了电击(P = 0.03)。在死亡前的最后一周,三组中分别有3例(20%)、2例(6%)和6例(13%)患者接受了ICD电击(P = 0.28)。

结论

对于濒临死亡风险的终末期患者,积极管理患者的ICD,包括及时讨论ICD停用问题,可能会降低临终期间ICD电击的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验