Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(2):243-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3558-5. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
We investigated whether higher activation of the cerebellar cortex in unpredictable compared to predictable sequential finger movements reflects higher demands in motor response selection or also increases in demands on motor sequencing. Furthermore, we asked the question whether the cerebellar nuclei show a similar or reversed response profile as the cerebellar cortex. Ultra-high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in nineteen right-handed, healthy young participants. Tasks involved finger tapping of a constant sequence, a random sequence, and with one finger at a time (no sequence). Conditions involved the same number of movements of fingers II-V. The three tasks were accompanied by the activation of the known hand areas within the cerebellar cortex and dentate nuclei. Activation of the cerebellar cortex and the dorsorostral dentate was significantly increased in the random-sequence condition compared to both the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions, with no significant difference between the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions. Error rate and movement frequency was not significantly different between conditions. Thus, differences between conditions cannot be explained by differences in motor execution. Because no difference was observed between the no-sequence and the constant-sequence conditions, increased cerebellar activation in the random-sequence condition likely reflects increased demands in motor response selection. Co-activation of cerebellar cortex and nuclei may be a consequence of excitatory afferent collaterals to the nuclei, "rebound-firing" of dentate neurons, and/or inhibitory synaptic input from Purkinje cells.
我们研究了在不可预测的顺序手指运动与可预测的顺序手指运动相比,小脑皮层的更高激活是否反映了运动反应选择的更高要求,还是对运动序列的要求也增加了。此外,我们还询问了小脑核是否表现出与小脑皮层相似或相反的反应模式。在十九名右利手的健康年轻参与者中进行了超高场 7T 功能磁共振成像。任务包括手指敲击固定序列、随机序列和一次用一根手指(无序列)。条件涉及手指 II-V 的相同运动次数。这三个任务伴随着已知的手区在小脑皮层和齿状核内的激活。与恒定序列和无序列条件相比,随机序列条件下小脑皮层和背侧齿状核的激活显著增加,而恒定序列和无序列条件之间没有显著差异。条件之间的错误率和运动频率没有显著差异。因此,条件之间的差异不能用运动执行的差异来解释。由于无序列和恒定序列条件之间没有观察到差异,因此随机序列条件下小脑激活增加可能反映了运动反应选择要求的增加。小脑皮层和核的共同激活可能是核兴奋性传入侧支、齿状神经元“反弹”和/或来自浦肯野细胞的抑制性突触输入的结果。