Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Neonatology, Intensive Care, and Neuropediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;132(1):e211-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2346. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
To evaluate the implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs.
The intervention started with the evaluation of local practice, problems, and staff satisfaction. We then developed and implemented the Vienna Protocol for Neonatal Pain and Sedation. The protocol included well-defined strategies for both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions based on regular assessment of a translated version of the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale and titration of analgesic and sedative therapy according to aim scores. Health care staff was trained in the assessment by using a video-based tutorial and bedside teaching. In addition, we performed reevaluation, retraining, and random quality checks. Frequency and quality of assessments, pharmacologic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were compared between baseline (12 months before implementation) and 12 months after implementation.
Cumulative median (interquartile range) opiate dose (baseline dose of 1.4 [0.5-5.9] mg/kg versus intervention group dose of 2.7 [0.4-57] mg/kg morphine equivalents; P = .002), pharmacologic interventions per episode of continuous sedation/analgesia (4 [2-10] vs 6 [2-13]; P = .005), and overall staff satisfaction (physicians: 31% vs 89%; P < .001; nurses: 17% vs 55%; P < .001) increased after implementation. Time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay at the ICU, and adverse outcomes were similar before and after implementation.
Implementation of a neonatal pain and sedation protocol at 2 ICUs resulted in an increase in opiate prescription, pharmacologic interventions, and staff satisfaction without affecting time on mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care stay, and adverse outcomes.
评估 2 家 ICU 中新生儿疼痛和镇静方案的实施情况。
干预措施始于评估当地实践、问题和员工满意度。然后,我们制定并实施了维也纳新生儿疼痛和镇静方案。该方案包括基于新生儿疼痛、激动和镇静量表翻译版本的定期评估以及根据目标评分滴定镇痛和镇静治疗的明确非药物和药物干预策略。医护人员通过视频教程和床边教学接受评估培训。此外,我们还进行了重新评估、再培训和随机质量检查。在实施前 12 个月(基线)和实施后 12 个月比较了评估频率和质量、药物治疗、机械通气持续时间和结局。
累积中位数(四分位间距)阿片类药物剂量(基线剂量为 1.4 [0.5-5.9] mg/kg 与吗啡当量 2.7 [0.4-57] mg/kg;P =.002)、每例连续镇静/镇痛发作的药物干预次数(4 [2-10] 与 6 [2-13];P =.005)和整体员工满意度(医生:31% 与 89%;P <.001;护士:17% 与 55%;P <.001)在实施后增加。机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间和不良结局在实施前后相似。
在 2 家 ICU 实施新生儿疼痛和镇静方案可增加阿片类药物处方、药物干预和员工满意度,而不会影响机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间和不良结局。