• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施疼痛、躁动和谵妄的综合管理方案可改善重症监护病房的临床转归:一项随机临床试验。

Implementation of a protocol for integrated management of pain, agitation, and delirium can improve clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Medical-Surgical Nursing Group, Fatemeh Nursing and Midwifery School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019
PMID:24011845
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate diagnosis and treatment of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in intensive care settings results in poor patient outcomes. We designed and used a protocol for systematic assessment and management of PAD by the nurses to improve clinical intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 201 patients admitted to 2 mixed medical-surgical ICUs were randomly allocated to protocol and control groups. A multidisciplinary team approved the protocol. Pain was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale and Behavioural Pain Scale, agitation by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and delirium by Confusion Assessment Method in ICU. The Persian version of the scales was prepared and tested for validity, reliability, and feasibility in a preliminary study. The patients in the protocol group were managed pharmacologically according to the protocol, whereas those in the control group were managed according to the ICU routine.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) for the duration of mechanical ventilation in the protocol and control groups was 19 (9.3-67.8) and 40 (0-217) hours, respectively (P = .038). The median (interquartile range) length of ICU stay was 97 (54.5-189) hours in the protocol group vs 170 (80-408) hours in the control group (P < .001). The mortality rate in the protocol group was significantly reduced from 23.8% to 12.5% (P = .046).

CONCLUSION

The current randomized trial provided evidence for a substantial reduction in the duration of need to ventilatory support, length of ICU stay, and mortality rates in ICU-admitted patients through protocol-directed management of PAD.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房中,疼痛、躁动和谵妄(PAD)的诊断和治疗不当会导致患者预后不良。我们设计并使用了一种由护士对 PAD 进行系统评估和管理的方案,以改善临床重症监护病房(ICU)的结局。

材料和方法

共有 201 名入住 2 间混合内科-外科 ICU 的患者被随机分配到方案组和对照组。一个多学科团队批准了该方案。疼痛通过数字评分量表和行为疼痛量表进行评估,躁动通过 Richmond 躁动镇静量表,谵妄通过 ICU 意识模糊评估法进行评估。该量表的波斯语版本已在初步研究中进行了有效性、可靠性和可行性的测试。方案组的患者根据方案进行药物治疗,而对照组的患者则根据 ICU 常规进行治疗。

结果

方案组和对照组机械通气时间的中位数(四分位距)分别为 19(9.3-67.8)和 40(0-217)小时(P=.038)。方案组 ICU 住院时间的中位数(四分位距)为 97(54.5-189)小时,对照组为 170(80-408)小时(P <.001)。方案组的死亡率从 23.8%显著降低至 12.5%(P=.046)。

结论

本随机试验提供了证据,表明通过方案指导的 PAD 管理,可以显著降低 ICU 患者通气支持需求时间、ICU 住院时间和死亡率。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a protocol for integrated management of pain, agitation, and delirium can improve clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial.实施疼痛、躁动和谵妄的综合管理方案可改善重症监护病房的临床转归:一项随机临床试验。
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.
3
I-SAVE study: impact of sedation, analgesia, and delirium protocols evaluated in the intensive care unit: an economic evaluation.I-SAVE 研究:在重症监护病房评估镇静、镇痛和谵妄方案的影响:一项经济评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q284. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
4
The methodological approach used to develop the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Clinical Practice Guidelines for adult ICU patients.2013 年成人 ICU 患者疼痛、躁动和谵妄临床实践指南的制定方法。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S1-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a167d7.
5
Protocolized intensive care unit management of analgesia, sedation, and delirium improves analgesia and subsyndromal delirium rates.规范化的重症加强护理病房镇痛、镇静和谵妄管理可提高镇痛和亚综合征性谵妄的发生率。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):451-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d7e1b8. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
6
Evaluating pain, sedation, and delirium in the neurologically critically ill-feasibility and reliability of standardized tools: a multi-institutional study.评估神经危重症患者的疼痛、镇静和谵妄:标准化工具的可行性和可靠性:一项多机构研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):2002-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e96c0.
7
The pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle: synergistic benefits of implementing the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines in an integrated and interdisciplinary fashion.疼痛、躁动和谵妄护理捆绑包:以综合和跨学科的方式实施 2013 年疼痛、躁动和谵妄指南的协同益处。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S99-115. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16ff0.
8
Feasibility of a Nurse-Managed Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Protocol in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.护士管理的疼痛、躁动和谵妄护理方案在外科重症监护病房的可行性
Crit Care Nurse. 2017 Dec;37(6):24-34. doi: 10.4037/ccn2017528.
9
Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房中疼痛与躁动系统评估的影响
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1691-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218416.62457.56.
10
Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines: Interprofessional Perspectives to Translate the Evidence.疼痛、躁动与谵妄指南:跨专业视角下的证据转化
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;36(3):164-173. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000239.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Nurse-Driven Analgesia and Sedation Protocols on Medication Exposure and Withdrawal in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案对危重症儿童药物暴露及撤药的影响:一项系统评价
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70051. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70051.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation of the State Behavioral Scale to Brazilian Portuguese.《国家行为量表》跨文化适应为巴西葡萄牙语版本。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Mar 24;37:e20250183. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250183. eCollection 2025.
3
Position Statement of ISCCM Committee on Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator.
国际危重症护理医学学会机械通气撤机委员会立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S233-S248. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24716. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
4
Optimizing patient outcomes: a comprehensive evaluation of protocolized sedation in intensive care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.优化患者预后:重症监护环境中程序化镇静的综合评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Apr 24;29(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01839-y.
5
Pain Assessment with the BPS and CCPOT Behavioral Pain Scales in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Requiring Analgesia and Sedation.机械通气患者镇痛镇静时应用 BPS 和 CCPOT 行为疼痛量表进行疼痛评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710894.
6
Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran.重症监护病房成年患者的身体约束及其相关因素:伊朗北部的一项横断面研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;26(2):192-198. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24103.
7
Sedation protocols in the pediatric intensive care unit: fact or fiction?儿科重症监护病房的镇静方案:事实还是虚构?
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2814-2824. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-328.
8
The Effect of Benson's Relaxation Technique on Pain Intensity, Belief, Perception, and Acceptance in adult Hemophilia Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.本森放松技巧对成年血友病患者疼痛强度、信念、感知及接受度的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2021 Jul;9(3):187-198. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2021.87937.1471.
9
Effects of pain, sedation and delirium monitoring on clinical and economic outcome: A retrospective study.疼痛、镇静和谵妄监测对临床和经济结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0234801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234801. eCollection 2020.
10
Effect of Comprehensive Pain Management Training Program on Awareness and Attitude of ICU Nurses.综合疼痛管理培训计划对重症监护病房护士认知及态度的影响
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar 24;10(2):e98679. doi: 10.5812/aapm.98679. eCollection 2020 Apr.