Medical-Surgical Nursing Group, Fatemeh Nursing and Midwifery School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
Inappropriate diagnosis and treatment of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in intensive care settings results in poor patient outcomes. We designed and used a protocol for systematic assessment and management of PAD by the nurses to improve clinical intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes.
A total of 201 patients admitted to 2 mixed medical-surgical ICUs were randomly allocated to protocol and control groups. A multidisciplinary team approved the protocol. Pain was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale and Behavioural Pain Scale, agitation by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and delirium by Confusion Assessment Method in ICU. The Persian version of the scales was prepared and tested for validity, reliability, and feasibility in a preliminary study. The patients in the protocol group were managed pharmacologically according to the protocol, whereas those in the control group were managed according to the ICU routine.
The median (interquartile range) for the duration of mechanical ventilation in the protocol and control groups was 19 (9.3-67.8) and 40 (0-217) hours, respectively (P = .038). The median (interquartile range) length of ICU stay was 97 (54.5-189) hours in the protocol group vs 170 (80-408) hours in the control group (P < .001). The mortality rate in the protocol group was significantly reduced from 23.8% to 12.5% (P = .046).
The current randomized trial provided evidence for a substantial reduction in the duration of need to ventilatory support, length of ICU stay, and mortality rates in ICU-admitted patients through protocol-directed management of PAD.
在重症监护病房中,疼痛、躁动和谵妄(PAD)的诊断和治疗不当会导致患者预后不良。我们设计并使用了一种由护士对 PAD 进行系统评估和管理的方案,以改善临床重症监护病房(ICU)的结局。
共有 201 名入住 2 间混合内科-外科 ICU 的患者被随机分配到方案组和对照组。一个多学科团队批准了该方案。疼痛通过数字评分量表和行为疼痛量表进行评估,躁动通过 Richmond 躁动镇静量表,谵妄通过 ICU 意识模糊评估法进行评估。该量表的波斯语版本已在初步研究中进行了有效性、可靠性和可行性的测试。方案组的患者根据方案进行药物治疗,而对照组的患者则根据 ICU 常规进行治疗。
方案组和对照组机械通气时间的中位数(四分位距)分别为 19(9.3-67.8)和 40(0-217)小时(P=.038)。方案组 ICU 住院时间的中位数(四分位距)为 97(54.5-189)小时,对照组为 170(80-408)小时(P <.001)。方案组的死亡率从 23.8%显著降低至 12.5%(P=.046)。
本随机试验提供了证据,表明通过方案指导的 PAD 管理,可以显著降低 ICU 患者通气支持需求时间、ICU 住院时间和死亡率。