Centre for Ecological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanów Leśny, Poland.
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064852. Print 2013.
When data are limited it is difficult for conservation managers to assess alternative management scenarios and make decisions. The natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) is declining at the edges of its distribution range in Europe and little is known about its current distribution and abundance in Poland. Although different landscape management plans for central Poland exist, it is unclear to what extent they impact this species. Based on these plans, we investigated how four alternative landscape development scenarios would affect the total carrying capacity and population dynamics of the natterjack toad. To facilitate decision-making, we first ranked the scenarios according to their total carrying capacity. We used the software RAMAS GIS to determine the size and location of habitat patches in the landscape. The estimated carrying capacities were very similar for each scenario, and clear ranking was not possible. Only the reforestation scenario showed a marked loss in carrying capacity. We therefore simulated metapopulation dynamics with RAMAS taking into account dynamical processes such as reproduction and dispersal and ranked the scenarios according to the resulting species abundance. In this case, we could clearly rank the development scenarios. We identified road mortality of adults as a key process governing the dynamics and separating the different scenarios. The renaturalisation scenario clearly ranked highest due to its decreased road mortality. Taken together our results suggest that road infrastructure development might be much more important for natterjack toad conservation than changes in the amount of habitat in the semi-natural river valley. We gained these insights by considering both the resulting metapopulation structure and dynamics in the form of a PVA. We conclude that the consideration of dynamic processes in amphibian conservation management may be indispensable for ranking management scenarios.
当数据有限时,保护管理者很难评估替代管理方案并做出决策。欧洲的黄缘蟾蜍(Bufo calamita)在其分布范围的边缘正在减少,而关于其在波兰的当前分布和数量知之甚少。尽管波兰中部存在不同的景观管理计划,但尚不清楚这些计划对该物种的影响程度。基于这些计划,我们研究了四种替代景观发展情景将如何影响黄缘蟾蜍的总承载能力和种群动态。为了便于决策,我们首先根据总承载能力对情景进行了排名。我们使用 RAMAS GIS 软件来确定景观中栖息地斑块的大小和位置。每个情景的估计承载能力非常相似,无法进行明确的排名。只有造林情景显示出明显的承载能力下降。因此,我们考虑了繁殖和扩散等动态过程,使用 RAMAS 模拟了集合种群动态,并根据物种丰度对情景进行了排名。在这种情况下,我们可以清楚地对发展情景进行排名。我们确定了成年个体的道路死亡率是控制动态和区分不同情景的关键过程。由于道路死亡率降低,自然恢复情景明显排名最高。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,道路基础设施的发展对黄缘蟾蜍的保护可能比半自然河谷中栖息地数量的变化更为重要。我们通过考虑以 PVA 的形式得出的集合种群结构和动态来获得这些见解。我们得出的结论是,在对管理方案进行排名时,考虑两栖类动物保护管理中的动态过程可能是不可或缺的。