Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(1):106-26. doi: 10.1108/14777261311311825.
Since the 1970s, the healthcare industry has undergone significant changes. Using neo-institutional and resource dependency theories, the purpose of this paper is to explore how managers perceive constraint and enact agency amidst these historic challenges--perhaps most significantly, declining funding and increasing regulation.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The data come from ten interviews with healthcare managers, spanning for-profit, non-profit, and government legal forms and hospital and nursing home sub-industries in both Queensland, Australia and North Carolina, USA. The authors look for patterns across the interviews.
The paper shows that governments and umbrella "parent" organizations force managers to adhere to institutional expectations in exchange for resource investment. Managers navigate these environmental obstacles using a shared business-minded approach and competitive differentiation. Yet various interest groups--including front-line workers, physicians, and patients--challenge this paradigm, as they demand a focus on quality of care. Managers' efforts are likewise curbed by the very resource and institutional pressures they resist.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The authors understand changes in the healthcare industry as resulting from an increasingly powerful managerial logic, at odds with traditional professional and societal values. Interest groups are best positioned to challenge this logic.
自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,医疗保健行业发生了重大变化。本文运用新制度主义和资源依赖理论,探讨了管理者在面临这些历史性挑战时(或许最重要的是资金减少和监管增加)如何感知约束并采取行动。
设计/方法/途径:数据来自对 10 位医疗保健经理的访谈,涵盖了澳大利亚昆士兰州和美国北卡罗来纳州的营利性、非营利性和政府法律形式以及医院和疗养院等子行业。作者在访谈中寻找模式。
本文表明,政府和伞式“母公司”迫使管理者遵守制度期望,以换取资源投资。管理者采用共享的商业思维方式和竞争差异化来应对这些环境障碍。然而,包括一线工人、医生和患者在内的各种利益集团对这一模式提出了挑战,因为他们要求关注护理质量。管理者的努力也受到他们所抵制的资源和制度压力的限制。
原创性/价值:作者认为医疗保健行业的变化是由日益强大的管理逻辑导致的,这种逻辑与传统的专业和社会价值观相冲突。利益集团最有能力挑战这一逻辑。