Suppr超能文献

12 个月以下、有明显生命危险的婴儿是否需要转运到儿科重症监护中心?

Do infants less than 12 months of age with an apparent life-threatening event need transport to a pediatric critical care center?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance , CA 90509, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):304-11. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.773111.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems transport infants with an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) directly to hospitals capable of pediatric critical care (PCC) monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

To describe factors identifiable by EMS providers that distinguish ALTE patients who may require PCC monitoring and management.

METHODS

This was an observational analysis of ALTE patients who were transported by EMS and presented to four emergency departments (EDs). ED data were prospectively collected. Hospital records or reports from contacted parents were reviewed for interventions that mandated PCC management. We defined a priori the criteria by which PCC monitoring and management were required: if the subject needed 1) airway intervention with bag-valve-mask ventilation or advanced airway (e.g., endotracheal intubation) in the field, ED, or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); 2) administration of vasopressors; 3) invasive monitoring; 4) surgery during the hospitalization; or 5) subspecialty consultation. Univariate analysis was performed to describe factors associated with requiring PCC management, and a multivariable model, accounting for within-hospital correlations, was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 513 patients were enrolled. Of these, 51 (9.9%) had an intervention warranting PCC management. Univariate predictors for requiring PCC management included prematurity, past medical history, resuscitation attempt, upper respiratory infection, apnea, previous ALTE, more than one ALTE in 24 hours, and cyanosis. The multivariable model yielded the following independent predictors for requiring PCC management: resuscitation attempt before EMS arrival, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours. This model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.3%, a specificity of 25.8%, a negative predictive value of 98.3%, and a positive predictive value of 13.5%.

CONCLUSION

Only 9.9% of infants presenting in the field with ALTE had an intervention warranting PCC management, suggesting that many ALTE patients may be safely transported to hospitals without PCC capability. This would allow for better resource utilization of specialty care hospitals and still provide an option for secondary transports for those few patients not correctly identified in the field as requiring PCC. History of resuscitation attempt, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours are independent risk factors for requiring PCC management.

摘要

背景

一些急救医疗服务(EMS)系统将表现出明显危及生命的事件(ALTE)的婴儿直接转运至能够进行儿科重症监护(PCC)监测的医院。

目的

描述可由 EMS 提供者识别的区分可能需要 PCC 监测和管理的 ALTE 患者的因素。

方法

这是一项对通过 EMS 转运并就诊于四个急诊部(ED)的 ALTE 患者进行的观察性分析。ED 数据是前瞻性收集的。查阅联系到的患儿家长的医院记录或报告,以确定需要进行 PCC 管理的干预措施。我们预先定义了需要进行 PCC 监测和管理的标准:如果患者需要 1)在现场、ED 或儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行气道干预,例如球囊面罩通气或高级气道;2)使用血管加压药;3)进行有创监测;4)住院期间进行手术;或 5)接受专科会诊。进行单变量分析以描述与需要 PCC 管理相关的因素,并建立了一个多变量模型,以考虑到医院内相关性。

结果

共纳入 513 名患者。其中,51 名(9.9%)患者需要进行干预,以确保 PCC 管理。需要 PCC 管理的单变量预测因素包括早产、既往病史、复苏尝试、上呼吸道感染、呼吸暂停、既往 ALTE、24 小时内发生超过一次 ALTE 以及发绀。多变量模型得出了以下需要 PCC 管理的独立预测因素:在 EMS 到达前进行复苏尝试、发绀以及 24 小时内发生超过一次 ALTE。该模型的敏感性为 96.3%、特异性为 25.8%、阴性预测值为 98.3%和阳性预测值为 13.5%。

结论

仅有 9.9%的在现场出现 ALTE 的婴儿需要进行干预,以确保进行 PCC 管理,这表明许多 ALTE 患者可以安全地转运至没有 PCC 能力的医院。这将使专科护理医院更好地利用资源,并且仍然为那些在现场未能正确识别为需要 PCC 管理的少数患者提供了二次转运的选择。复苏尝试、发绀以及 24 小时内发生超过一次 ALTE 的历史是需要 PCC 管理的独立危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验