Suppr超能文献

国家调查数据集的二次分析。

Secondary analysis of national survey datasets.

作者信息

Boo Sunjoo, Froelicher Erika Sivarajan

机构信息

Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0610, USA.

出版信息

Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2013 Jun;10(1):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2012.00213.x. Epub 2012 May 14.

Abstract

AIM

This paper describes the methodological issues associated with secondary analysis of large national survey datasets.

METHODS

Issues about survey sampling, data collection, and non-response and missing data in terms of methodological validity and reliability are discussed.

RESULTS

Although reanalyzing large national survey datasets is an expedient and cost-efficient way of producing nursing knowledge, successful investigations require a methodological consideration of the intrinsic limitations of secondary survey analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing researchers using existing national survey datasets should understand potential sources of error associated with survey sampling, data collection, and non-response and missing data. Although it is impossible to eliminate all potential errors, researchers using existing national survey datasets must be aware of the possible influence of errors on the results of the analyses.

摘要

目的

本文描述了与大型全国性调查数据集二次分析相关的方法学问题。

方法

从方法学的有效性和可靠性方面,讨论了调查抽样、数据收集以及无应答和缺失数据的问题。

结果

尽管重新分析大型全国性调查数据集是产生护理知识的一种便捷且经济高效的方式,但成功的调查需要从方法学角度考虑二次调查分析的内在局限性。

结论

使用现有全国性调查数据集的护理研究人员应了解与调查抽样、数据收集以及无应答和缺失数据相关的潜在误差来源。虽然不可能消除所有潜在误差,但使用现有全国性调查数据集的研究人员必须意识到误差对分析结果可能产生的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验