Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
The animacy distinction is deeply rooted in the language faculty. A key example is differential object marking, the phenomenon where animate sentential objects receive specific marking. We used event-related potentials to examine the neural processing consequences of case-marking violations on animate and inanimate direct objects in Spanish. Inanimate objects with incorrect prepositional case marker 'a' ('al suelo') elicited a P600 effect compared to unmarked objects, consistent with previous literature. However, animate objects without the required prepositional case marker ('el obispo') only elicited an N400 effect compared to marked objects. This novel finding, an exclusive N400 modulation by a straightforward grammatical rule violation, does not follow from extant neurocognitive models of sentence processing, and mirrors unexpected "semantic P600" effects for thematically problematic sentences. These results may reflect animacy asymmetry in competition for argument prominence: following the article, thematic interpretation difficulties are elicited only by unexpectedly animate objects.
生命性区别深深植根于语言能力中。一个关键的例子是有差别的宾语标记,即有生命的句子宾语需要特定标记的现象。我们使用事件相关电位来研究西班牙语中宾格标记违规对有生命和无生命直接宾语的神经处理后果。与未标记的宾语相比,带有错误前置词宾格标记“a”(“al suelo”)的无生命宾语会引起 P600 效应,这与先前的文献一致。然而,没有所需前置词宾格标记的有生命宾语(“el obispo”)仅与标记的宾语相比引起 N400 效应。这种新的发现,即简单的语法规则违规引起的排他性 N400 调制,不符合现有的句子处理神经认知模型,并且与主题有问题的句子的意外“语义 P600”效应相呼应。这些结果可能反映了竞争论点突出性的生命性不对称:在冠词之后,只有出人意料的有生命的宾语才会引起主题解释困难。