Hanna Jeff, Shtyrov Yury, Williams John, Pulvermüller Friedemann
Brain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany; Medical Research Council - Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark; Medical Research Council - Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Feb;82:18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
Humans show variable degrees of success in acquiring a second language (L2). In many cases, morphological and syntactic knowledge remain deficient, although some learners succeed in reaching nativelike levels, even if they begin acquiring their L2 relatively late. In this study, we use psycholinguistic, online language proficiency tests and a neurophysiological index of syntactic processing, the syntactic mismatch negativity (sMMN) to local agreement violations, to compare behavioural and neurophysiological markers of grammar processing between native speakers (NS) of English and non-native speakers (NNS). Variable grammar proficiency was measured by psycholinguistic tests. When NS heard ungrammatical word sequences lacking agreement between subject and verb (e.g. *we kicks), the MMN was enhanced compared with syntactically legal sentences (e.g. he kicks). More proficient NNS also showed this difference, but less proficient NNS did not. The main cortical sources of the MMN responses were localised in bilateral superior temporal areas, where, crucially, source strength of grammar-related neuronal activity correlated significantly with grammatical proficiency of individual L2 speakers as revealed by the psycholinguistic tests. As our results show similar, early MMN indices to morpho-syntactic agreement violations among both native speakers and non-native speakers with high grammar proficiency, they appear consistent with the use of similar brain mechanisms for at least certain aspects of L1 and L2 grammars.
人类在习得第二语言(L2)方面表现出不同程度的成功。在许多情况下,形态学和句法知识仍然不足,尽管一些学习者成功达到了母语水平,即使他们相对较晚才开始学习L2。在本研究中,我们使用心理语言学的在线语言能力测试以及句法处理的神经生理学指标——句法失配负波(sMMN)来检测局部一致性违反情况,以比较以英语为母语者(NS)和非母语者(NNS)之间语法处理的行为和神经生理学标记。通过心理语言学测试来衡量不同的语法能力。当以英语为母语者听到主语和动词之间缺乏一致性的不符合语法的单词序列(例如*we kicks)时,与符合句法的句子(例如he kicks)相比,MMN增强。更熟练的非母语者也表现出这种差异,但不太熟练的非母语者则没有。MMN反应的主要皮质源定位于双侧颞上区,至关重要的是,如心理语言学测试所揭示的,与语法相关的神经元活动的源强度与个体第二语言使用者的语法能力显著相关。由于我们的结果显示,母语者和语法能力高的非母语者在形态句法一致性违反方面有相似的早期MMN指标,它们似乎与至少在第一语言和第二语言语法的某些方面使用相似的大脑机制一致。