Dröge Alexander, Fleischer Jürg, Schlesewsky Matthias, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky Ina
Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstraße 3, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstraße 3, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Brain Res. 2016 Feb 15;1633:149-166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.045. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
The specificity or generality of language-related event-related brain potentials (ERPs) has been a point of continuing debate in the cognitive neuroscience of language. The present study measured ERPs to (preferred) subject-before-object (SO) and (dispreferred) object-before-subject (OS) word orders in German while manipulating morphosyntactic and semantic cues to correct sentence interpretation. We presented sentence pairs as connected speech (context and target sentences) and examined ERPs at the position of the first argument (noun phrase) in the target sentence. At this position, word order was determinable by either (a) case marking (morphosyntactic cue); (b) animacy (semantic cue); or (c) the preceding context sentence (local ambiguity; contextual cue). Following each sentence pair, participants judged the acceptability of the second sentence in the context of the first and performed a probe word recognition task. Results showed a biphasic N400-P600 pattern at the first noun phrase in the OS conditions irrespectively of which cues (syntactic or semantic) were available to the parser for disambiguation. N400 latency varied as a function of temporal cue availability and P600 amplitude increased for unambiguous object-initial conditions even though these were rated acceptable in the judgment task. These findings support an interpretation of ERP components in terms of general cognitive mechanisms such as predictive processes (N400) and decision certainty (P600 as an instance of the P300) rather than a domain-specific view of a semantic N400 and a syntactic P600.
在语言认知神经科学领域,与语言相关的事件相关脑电位(ERP)的特异性或普遍性一直是持续争论的焦点。本研究在德语中测量了ERP对(偏好的)主语在前宾语在后(SO)和(非偏好的)宾语在前主语在后(OS)语序的反应,同时操纵形态句法和语义线索以校正句子解释。我们将句子对呈现为连贯言语(上下文和目标句子),并在目标句子中第一个论元(名词短语)的位置检查ERP。在这个位置,语序可以通过以下方式确定:(a)格标记(形态句法线索);(b)生命性(语义线索);或(c)前面的上下文句子(局部歧义;语境线索)。在每对句子之后,参与者判断第二个句子在第一个句子语境中的可接受性,并执行一个探测词识别任务。结果表明,在OS条件下,第一个名词短语处出现了双相N400 - P600模式,无论句法分析器可用于消除歧义的是哪些线索(句法或语义)。N400潜伏期随时间线索可用性而变化,对于明确的宾语在前条件P600波幅增加,尽管这些在判断任务中被评为可接受。这些发现支持根据预测过程(N400)和决策确定性(P600作为P300的一个实例)等一般认知机制来解释ERP成分,而不是语义N400和句法P600的领域特定观点。