• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PDR 或 ADR 作为结肠镜检查的质量指标。

PDR or ADR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):1000-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.99.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2013.99
PMID:23735919
Abstract

Interval (missed) cancers and lower-than-expected mortality reduction of proximal colon cancers after screening colonoscopy drew attention to quality indicators. Small proximal polyps (prone to be advanced neoplasms) missed by colonoscopy are possible contributing factors. In this issue of AJG, the subject of polyp detection rates (PDRs) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs) in the proximal and distal colon is discussed by one group of investigators to address the issue of monitoring performance and to achieve improvement. The authors observed that these two parameters correlated well in segments proximal to the splenic flexure, but not in the left colon. They suggested that caution should be exercised when using PDR as a surrogate for ADR if data from the rectum and sigmoid were included. Avoidance of missed lesions at the time of colonoscopy may require new adjunct measures to enhance ADR. The impact of new adjunct measures on ADR is mixed. In contrast to water immersion, water exchange during insertion has consistently increased ADR during withdrawal inspection. Water exchange may be a suitable alternative platform to replace insertion by air insufflation in the evaluation of new adjunct measures of quality improvement to increase ADR. Payment reforms may be necessary to bring about inclusion of ADR reporting for monitoring of quality performance.

摘要

间期(漏检)癌症和结肠镜筛查后近端结肠癌死亡率降低低于预期,这引起了人们对质量指标的关注。结肠镜漏检的小的近端息肉(易发生高级别肿瘤)可能是促成因素。在本期 AJG 中,一组研究人员讨论了近端和远端结肠的息肉检出率(PDR)和腺瘤检出率(ADR),以解决监测性能和实现改进的问题。作者观察到,在脾曲近端的节段,这两个参数相关性较好,但在左半结肠则不然。他们建议,如果包括直肠和乙状结肠的数据,则应谨慎使用 PDR 作为 ADR 的替代指标。为了避免结肠镜检查时漏诊病变,可能需要新的辅助措施来提高 ADR。新辅助措施对 ADR 的影响是混杂的。与水浸法不同,在退镜检查时进行注水交换始终会增加退镜时的 ADR。水交换可能是一种合适的替代平台,可以替代空气充气插入,用于评估提高 ADR 的新辅助措施的质量改进,以提高 ADR。可能需要支付改革来纳入 ADR 报告,以监测质量绩效。

相似文献

1
PDR or ADR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy.PDR 或 ADR 作为结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):1000-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.99.
2
Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.近端结肠和远端结肠的息肉和腺瘤检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
3
[Usefulness of polyp and adenoma detection rate in the proximal and distal colon].[息肉和腺瘤在近端及远端结肠的检出率的有用性]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 25;63(1):11-7. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2014.63.1.11.
4
A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.一种提高结肠镜检查时腺瘤检出率的简单方法:改变患者体位。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;27(9):509-12. doi: 10.1155/2013/276043.
5
Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.肠道准备质量良好对腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检测的影响:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,采用标准化的准备质量评级
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
Screening colonoscopy from a large single center of Thailand - something needs to be changed?来自泰国一个大型单一中心的结肠镜筛查——是否需要做出改变?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(4):1361-4. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.4.1361.
7
Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.在受训内镜医师中,息肉检出率与腺瘤检出率密切相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Aug;65(8):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06049-0. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.筛查性结肠镜退镜时间阈值与近端锯齿状息肉检出率的关系。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3084-3090. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5187-0. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.结直肠各部位内镜退镜时间与腺瘤/息肉检出率的关系:一项 KASID 多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):523-530. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation efficacy and accuracy of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during colonoscopy: a prospective, multicentric, randomized, parallel-controlled study trial.结肠镜检查期间实时计算机辅助息肉检测系统的评估效能与准确性:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、平行对照研究试验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12080-x.
2
Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.不同结肠段腺瘤检出率与各自退镜时间的关系:一项回顾性单中心研究
JGH Open. 2025 Jan 8;9(1):e70095. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70095. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Implementation of colonoscopy quality monitoring in a Belgian university hospital with integrated computer-based extraction of adenoma detection rate.
在一家比利时大学医院实施结肠镜检查质量监测,并通过计算机集成提取腺瘤检出率。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E197-E202. doi: 10.1055/a-1326-1179. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查过程中,有意寻求检测出比常规操作更多的结直肠息肉吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022738.
5
Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.不同内镜检查方式对结直肠病变的检测比较:一项网状Meta分析和系统评价
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):154-162. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7535. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Multiple, zonal and multi-zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy.根据结肠镜检查时的肠道清洁质量得出的多发、局灶性和多灶性腺瘤检出率。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Dec;4(6):778-783. doi: 10.1177/2050640615617356. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
7
Antispasmodic drugs in colonoscopy: a review of their pharmacology, safety and efficacy in improving polyp detection and related outcomes.结肠镜检查中的抗痉挛药物:其药理学、安全性及改善息肉检出率和相关结果的疗效综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;10(1):101-113. doi: 10.1177/1756283X16670076. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: Influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication.结直肠腺瘤的分布、大小和形态由高病变检出率的结肠镜医师确定:年龄、性别和结肠镜检查适应证的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Jun;4(3):438-48. doi: 10.1177/2050640615610266. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
9
Simple colonoscopy reporting system checking the detection rate of colon polyps.用于检查结肠息肉检出率的简易结肠镜检查报告系统
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 21;21(31):9380-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9380.
10
Colonoscopy: quality indicators.结肠镜检查:质量指标。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 26;6(2):e77. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.5.