• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查性结肠镜退镜时间阈值与近端锯齿状息肉检出率的关系。

Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.

Center for Clinical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3084-3090. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5187-0. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-018-5187-0
PMID:29974376
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For adequate adenoma detection rate (ADR), guidelines recommend a mean withdrawal time (MWT) of ≥ 6 min. ADR has been shown to correlate strongly with proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSP-DR), which is another suggested quality measure for screening colonoscopy. However, the impact of directly measured withdrawal time on PSP-DR has not been rigorously studied. We examined the relationship between MWT to ADR and PSP-DR, with the aim of identifying a functional threshold withdrawal time associated with both increased ADR and PSP-DR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of endoscopy and pathology data from average-risk screening colonoscopy examinations performed at a large system with six endoscopy laboratories. A natural language processing tool was used to determine polyp location and histology. ADR and PSP-DR were calculated for each endoscopist. MWT was calculated from colonoscopy examinations in which no polyps were resected.

RESULTS

In total, 31,558 colonoscopy examinations were performed, of which 10,196 were average-risk screening colonoscopy examinations with cecal intubation and adequate prep by 24 gastroenterologists. When assessing the statistical significance of increasing MWT by minute, the first significant time mark for PSP-DR was at 11 min at a rate of 14.2% (p = 0.01). There was a significant difference comparing aggregated MWT < 11 min compared to ≥ 11 min looking at the rates of adenomas [OR 1.65 (1.09-2.51)] and proximal serrated polyps [OR 1.81 (1.06-3.08)]. While ADR linearly correlated well with MWT (R = 0.76, p < 0.001), the linear relationship with PSP-DR was less robust (R = 0.42, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of average-risk screening colonoscopy, a MWT of 11 min resulted in a statistically significant increase in both ADR and PSP-DR. Our data suggest that a longer withdrawal time may be required to meet both quality metrics.

摘要

介绍

为了达到足够的腺瘤检出率(ADR),指南建议平均退镜时间(MWT)≥6 分钟。ADR 与近端锯齿状息肉检出率(PSP-DR)密切相关,PSP-DR 是另一种用于筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标。然而,直接测量的退镜时间对 PSP-DR 的影响尚未得到严格研究。我们检查了 MWT 与 ADR 和 PSP-DR 之间的关系,目的是确定与 ADR 和 PSP-DR 均增加相关的功能退镜时间阈值。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,涉及在一个拥有六个内镜实验室的大型系统中进行的平均风险筛查结肠镜检查的内镜和病理数据。使用自然语言处理工具来确定息肉的位置和组织学。为每位内镜医生计算 ADR 和 PSP-DR。MWT 是从未切除息肉的结肠镜检查中计算得出的。

结果

共进行了 31558 次结肠镜检查,其中 10196 次是平均风险筛查结肠镜检查,由 24 名胃肠病学家进行盲肠插管和充分准备。当按分钟评估 MWT 增加的统计学意义时,PSP-DR 的第一个显著时间标记是在 11 分钟时,发生率为 14.2%(p=0.01)。比较 MWT<11 分钟与≥11 分钟的聚合值时,在腺瘤的检出率[OR 1.65(1.09-2.51)]和近端锯齿状息肉[OR 1.81(1.06-3.08)]方面存在显著差异。虽然 ADR 与 MWT 呈良好的线性相关(R=0.76,p<0.001),但与 PSP-DR 的线性关系不那么稳健(R=0.42,p=0.043)。

结论

在这项大型平均风险筛查结肠镜检查队列中,MWT 为 11 分钟可显著提高 ADR 和 PSP-DR。我们的数据表明,可能需要更长的退镜时间才能达到这两个质量指标。

相似文献

1
Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.筛查性结肠镜退镜时间阈值与近端锯齿状息肉检出率的关系。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3084-3090. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5187-0. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.近端锯齿状息肉检出率是临床相关锯齿状息肉检出率的一个易于测量的替代指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.044. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
3
Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状息肉的检出率:因患者性别和结肠节段而异,但与内镜医师的专业无关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1113-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000183.
4
Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.经总体腺瘤检出率校正后,与盲肠插管相比,回肠插管与右侧传统腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率升高无关。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1111-0.
5
Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.与监测腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检出率相关的因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Dec;62(12):3579-3585. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4792-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中近端结肠锯齿状息肉的流行情况和可变检测。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.提供锯齿状息肉检出率基准数据:新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
8
Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.澳大利亚检测息肉的时间和专业对检出率的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;34(5):899-906. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14566. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Impact of Changeover to Newer Endoscopic Systems on Quality and Efficiency of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Equipment or Endoscopist.新旧内镜系统切换对筛查和监测结肠镜检查质量和效率的影响:设备还是内镜医师。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov/Dec;52(10):891-895. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000931.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and Novel Colonoscopy Quality Metrics: What's Important in 2025.传统与新型结肠镜检查质量指标:2025年的关键要点
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Aug 8;27(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01006-1.
2
Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies.非筛查性结肠镜检查期间近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的差异
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82317. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review.结肠镜检查中的退镜时间:过去、现在与未来,一篇叙述性综述

本文引用的文献

1
High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.检测无蒂锯齿状息肉需要高质量的肠道准备。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.044. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
2
Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查后,较长的撤镜时间与间隔期癌症发生率降低相关。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):952-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
3
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 12;8:19. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-8. eCollection 2023.
4
Key quality indicators in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中的关键质量指标。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Mar 10;11:goad009. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad009. eCollection 2023.
5
Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Extract Features of Colorectal Polyps From Pathology Reports for Epidemiologic Study.利用自然语言处理技术从病理学报告中提取结直肠息肉特征用于流行病学研究。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jan;7:e2200131. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00131.
6
Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank.已知结直肠癌易感性 SNPs 预测结直肠癌风险的能力:英国生物库内的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0251469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251469. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience.国家内镜数据库(NED)对结肠镜退镜时间的影响:一家三级中心的经验。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000699.
8
Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.内镜检查单位认证指南:来自韩国结直肠外科学会的质量指标
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):154-165. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Impact of Moderate versus Deep Sedation and Trainee Participation on Adenoma Detection Rate-Analysis of a Veteran Population.中度与深度镇静及实习生参与对腺瘤检出率的影响——退伍军人人群分析
Clin Endosc. 2021 Mar;54(2):250-255. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.091. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.患者和医生因素与腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的关系。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3123-3131. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06419-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率增加的稳定性。内镜质量改进项目-EQUIP-II的随访
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;110(4):489-96. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.314. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
5
Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.间隔期结直肠癌的流行率、风险因素和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1375-89. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.171. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.基于自然语言处理的腺瘤解剖学和高级别腺瘤检出率作为质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1844-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.147. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Detection of serrated lesions: we are still in the teething stage.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study.漏诊或间隔期结直肠癌的特征和患者生存:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):950-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
9
Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.锯齿状和腺瘤性息肉的检出率随退镜时间的延长而增加:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;109(3):417-26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.442. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
10
Quality measures for colonoscopy: a critical evaluation.结肠镜检查的质量指标:批判性评价。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):1973-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.052. Epub 2013 Oct 2.