Pontone Stefano, Hassan Cesare, Maselli Roberta, Pontone Paolo, Angelini Rita, Brighi Manuela, Patrizi Gregorio, Pironi Daniele, Magliocca Fabio Massimo, Filippini Angelo
Department of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Roma, Italy.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Dec;4(6):778-783. doi: 10.1177/2050640615617356. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
The safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colon cleansing. The adenoma detection rate is usually used as a quality measurement score.
We aimed to introduce and evaluate three new parameters to determine polyps and adenomas segmental localization and their distribution in association with different bowel preparation levels during colonoscopy. We introduce the multiple adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy), the zonal adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy in different colon areas (rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, ascending and cecum colon)), and multi-zone adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy in different colon areas with at least a segment between them with or without lesions (i.e. rectum and descending colon with or without lesions in the sigmoid)).
We prospectively enrolled outpatients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2013 to October 2014. The bowel preparation quality, according to the Aronchick modified scale, number and location of lesions, Paris classification and histology, were recorded. The multiple adenoma/polyp detection rate, zonal adenoma/polyp detection rate, and multi-zone adenoma/polyp detection rate were determined.
In total, 519 consecutive patients (266/253 M/F; mean age 55.3 ± 12.8 years) were enrolled. The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 21% and 35%, respectively. Multiple adenomas were detected in 28 patients. Adenoma and polyp detection rate and new parameters were statistically significantly higher in the optimal as compared with the adequate bowel preparation.
An optimal level of bowel preparation was strongly associated not only with a higher adenoma detection rate, but also with a higher chance of detecting multiple clinically relevant lesions in adjacent or discrete segments of the colon.
结肠镜检查的安全性和诊断准确性取决于结肠清洁的质量。腺瘤检出率通常用作质量衡量指标。
我们旨在引入并评估三个新参数,以确定息肉和腺瘤的节段定位及其在结肠镜检查期间与不同肠道准备水平相关的分布情况。我们引入了多发腺瘤检出率(结肠镜检查期间诊断出>2个腺瘤的患者百分比)、分区腺瘤检出率(结肠镜检查期间在不同结肠区域(直肠、乙状结肠、降结肠、横结肠、升结肠和盲肠)诊断出>2个腺瘤的患者百分比)和多区腺瘤检出率(结肠镜检查期间在不同结肠区域诊断出>2个腺瘤的患者百分比,这些区域之间至少有一个节段有或无病变(即直肠和降结肠,乙状结肠有或无病变))。
我们前瞻性纳入了2013年1月至2014年10月接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者。记录根据阿隆奇克改良量表评估的肠道准备质量、病变数量和位置、巴黎分类和组织学情况。确定多发腺瘤/息肉检出率、分区腺瘤/息肉检出率和多区腺瘤/息肉检出率。
总共纳入了519例连续患者(男266例/女253例;平均年龄55.3±12.8岁)。腺瘤和息肉检出率分别为21%和35%。28例患者检测到多发腺瘤。与充分的肠道准备相比,最佳肠道准备组的腺瘤和息肉检出率及新参数在统计学上显著更高。
最佳的肠道准备水平不仅与更高的腺瘤检出率密切相关,而且与在结肠相邻或离散节段中检测到多个临床相关病变的更高几率密切相关。