Suppr超能文献

住院期间的导尿率能否降低,且益处大于风险?

Can in-hospital urinary catheterization rates be reduced with benefits outweighing the risks?

作者信息

Shimoni Zvi, Niven Mark, Froom Paul

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine B, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado Hospital, Kiryat Sanz, Netanya.

出版信息

South Med J. 2013 Jun;106(6):369-71. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182967baa.

Abstract

Urinary catheterization has risks and its use should be limited because it is the main cause of healthcare-associated urinary tract infection. Other risks are the potential for urethral injuries and the possibility that the catheter will be left in permanently. Rates of urinary catheterization in internal medicine departments generally range from 8% to 20%, with higher rates in older adult patients. Various attempts have been made to decrease catheterization rates with variable success. A major problem is that the guidelines and criteria for urinary catheterization are inconsistent and open to variable interpretations. More restrictive criteria based on observable patient benefit can reduce rates of urinary catheterization and may improve patient care.

摘要

导尿存在风险,应限制其使用,因为它是医疗相关尿路感染的主要原因。其他风险包括尿道损伤的可能性以及导尿管可能会被永久留置。内科病房的导尿率一般在8%至20%之间,老年患者的导尿率更高。人们已经进行了各种尝试来降低导尿率,但效果不一。一个主要问题是,导尿的指南和标准不一致,容易产生不同的解读。基于可观察到的患者获益制定更严格的标准,可以降低导尿率,并可能改善患者护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验