Warren J W
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1987 Dec;1(4):823-54.
The two most common indications for long-term catheterization are recalcitrant urinary incontinence and urinary obstruction that is not corrected by surgery. For incontinent patients, if behavioral changes, nursing care, special clothes, special bed clothes, and medications have not been successful, then a device to collect urine must be considered. For men such a device is a condom catheter; for women an analogous external collection device would be very useful. Suprapubic catheterization may offer an alternative but has been inadequately studied in this patient population. Long-term urinary catheterization has salutary effects for selected patients including patient comfort, family satisfaction, and nursing efficiency and effectiveness. To the patient for whom any physical movement is uncomfortable or painful, and indwelling catheter may be preferable to frequent changes of clothes. Similarly, the family of of severely impaired patients may want to accept the risks of urethral catheterization in order to keep the patient dry. Further, to the extent that the indwelling catheter is effective in decubitus ulcer prevention and/or management, long-term catheterization may diminish the risk of bacteremia or death from soft tissue infection. These benefits of long-term urethral catheterization, in addition to its risks, should be examined in future studies. Once a urethral catheter is in place, even with good catheter hygiene, bacterial entry can be postponed only temporarily; eventually all patients become bacteriuric. Indeed, as the catheter remains in place, organisms continue to enter, others leave or die, and the bacteriuria becomes complex, polymicrobial, and dynamic. Some organisms, particularly recognized uropathogens such as E. coli and K. pneumoniae, appear to reside in the urinary tract itself. Others, such as P. mirabilis, P. stuartii, and M. morganii, probably establish a niche within the urinary catheter, thus increasing their ability to cause subsequent bladder bacteriuria. The complications of long-term urinary catheterization include fevers, acute pyelonephritis, and bacteremias (such as seen in short-term catheterized patients), as well as catheter obstructions, urinary stones, chronic renal inflammation, local periurinary infections, vasicoureteral reflux, renal failure, and, for very long-term catheterized patients, bladder cancer. The thrust of catheter care for the long-term catheterized patient is to prevent complications of the omnipresent bacteriuria. Unfortunately, clinical opportunities for preventing complications are limited.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
长期导尿最常见的两个指征是顽固性尿失禁和手术无法纠正的尿路梗阻。对于尿失禁患者,如果行为改变、护理、特殊衣物、特殊床单及药物治疗均未成功,那么就必须考虑使用尿液收集装置。对于男性,这样的装置是阴茎套导尿管;对于女性,类似的外部收集装置会非常有用。耻骨上导尿可能是一种替代方法,但在该患者群体中尚未得到充分研究。长期导尿对部分患者有有益效果,包括患者舒适度、家庭满意度以及护理效率和效果。对于任何身体活动都感到不适或疼痛的患者,留置导尿管可能比频繁更换衣物更可取。同样,严重受损患者的家属可能愿意接受尿道导尿的风险,以使患者保持干爽。此外,在留置导尿管对预防和/或处理褥疮有效的程度上,长期导尿可能会降低菌血症或软组织感染导致死亡的风险。长期尿道导尿的这些益处及其风险,应在未来研究中加以审视。一旦插入尿道导尿管,即使保持良好的导管卫生,细菌进入也只能暂时推迟;最终所有患者都会发生菌尿。实际上,随着导尿管留置,细菌不断进入,其他细菌离开或死亡,菌尿变得复杂、多菌种且动态变化。一些细菌,特别是公认的尿路病原体,如大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,似乎存在于尿路本身。其他细菌,如奇异变形杆菌、斯氏普罗威登斯菌和摩根摩根菌,可能在导尿管内形成一个生态位,从而增加其引发后续膀胱菌尿的能力。长期导尿的并发症包括发热、急性肾盂肾炎和菌血症(如短期导尿患者所见),以及导管阻塞、尿路结石、慢性肾炎症、局部尿道周围感染、膀胱输尿管反流、肾衰竭,对于长期导尿患者,还有膀胱癌。长期导尿患者的导管护理重点是预防普遍存在的菌尿的并发症。不幸的是,预防并发症的临床机会有限。(摘要截选至400字)