Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081, BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leuphana University, Lünebrug, Germany.
World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):137-48. doi: 10.1002/wps.20038.
Although psychotherapy and antidepressant medication are efficacious in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders, it is not known whether they are equally efficacious for all types of disorders, and whether all types of psychotherapy and antidepressants are equally efficacious for each disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies in which psychotherapy and antidepressant medication were directly compared in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders. Systematic searches in bibliographical databases resulted in 67 randomized trials, including 5,993 patients that met inclusion criteria, 40 studies focusing on depressive disorders and 27 focusing on anxiety disorders. The overall effect size indicating the difference between psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy after treatment in all disorders was g=0.02 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.10), which was not statistically significant. Pharmacotherapy was significantly more efficacious than psychotherapy in dysthymia (g=0.30), and psychotherapy was significantly more efficacious than pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder (g=0.64). Furthermore, pharmacotherapy was significantly more efficacious than non-directive counseling (g=0.33), and psychotherapy was significantly more efficacious than pharmacotherapy with tricyclic antidepressants (g=0.21). These results remained significant when we controlled for other characteristics of the studies in multivariate meta-regression analysis, except for the differential effects in dysthymia, which were no longer statistically significant.
虽然心理治疗和抗抑郁药物在治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍方面是有效的,但尚不清楚它们对所有类型的障碍是否同样有效,也不清楚所有类型的心理治疗和抗抑郁药物对每种障碍是否同样有效。我们对直接比较心理治疗和抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍的研究进行了荟萃分析。在文献数据库中进行系统搜索,共产生了 67 项随机试验,包括符合纳入标准的 5993 名患者,其中 40 项研究侧重于抑郁障碍,27 项研究侧重于焦虑障碍。总体效应大小表明,治疗后所有障碍中心理治疗与药物治疗之间的差异为 g=0.02(95%CI:-0.07 至 0.10),无统计学意义。药物治疗在心境恶劣障碍方面明显优于心理治疗(g=0.30),而心理治疗在强迫症方面明显优于药物治疗(g=0.64)。此外,药物治疗明显优于非指导性咨询(g=0.33),而心理治疗明显优于三环类抗抑郁药的药物治疗(g=0.21)。在多元荟萃回归分析中控制研究的其他特征后,这些结果仍然具有统计学意义,除了心境恶劣障碍的差异效应不再具有统计学意义。