• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专门法院比普通法院更能为寄养儿童取得更好的结果吗?

Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?

机构信息

Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Eval Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):3-34. doi: 10.1177/0193841X13487536. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1177/0193841X13487536
PMID:23737613
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effects of unified family and drug treatment courts (DTCs) on the resolution of cases involving foster care children and the resulting effects on school performance.

METHOD

The first analytic step was to assess the impacts of presence of unified and DTCs in North Carolina counties on time children spent in foster care and the type of placement at exit from foster care. In the second step, the same data on foster care placements were merged with school records for youth in Grades 3-8 in public schools. The effect of children's time in foster care and placement outcomes on school performance as measured by math and reading tests, grade retention, and attendance was assessed using child fixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

Children in counties with unified family courts experienced shorter foster care spells and higher rates of reunification with parents or primary caregivers. Shorter foster care spells translated into improved school performance measured by end-of-grade reading and math test scores. Adult DTCs were associated with lower probability of reunification with parents/primary caregivers.

CONCLUSION

The shortened time in foster care implies an efficiency gain attributable to unified family courts, which translate into savings for the court system through the use of fewer resources. Children also benefit through shortened stays in temporary placements, which are related to some improved educational outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了家庭和药物治疗法院(DTC)一体化对解决寄养儿童案件的影响,以及对学校表现的影响。

方法

第一步分析是评估北卡罗来纳州各县是否存在家庭和 DTC 一体化对儿童在寄养中所花费时间的影响,以及在离开寄养时的安置类型。第二步,将同样的寄养安置数据与公立学校 3-8 年级的青年学校记录合并。使用儿童固定效应回归评估儿童在寄养中的时间和安置结果对数学和阅读测试、留级和出勤率等方面的学校表现的影响。

结果

在设有家庭综合法院的县,儿童的寄养时间较短,与父母或主要照顾者团聚的比例较高。较短的寄养时间转化为阅读和数学期末考试成绩的提高,表明学校表现有所改善。成年 DTC 与父母/主要照顾者团聚的可能性降低有关。

结论

寄养时间的缩短意味着家庭综合法院带来了效率的提高,通过使用更少的资源为法院系统节省了成本。儿童也通过临时安置时间的缩短受益,这与一些教育成果的提高有关。

相似文献

1
Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?专门法院比普通法院更能为寄养儿童取得更好的结果吗?
Eval Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):3-34. doi: 10.1177/0193841X13487536. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
2
Custody battle ends.监护权之争结束。
AIDS Policy Law. 1996 Feb 9;11(2):12.
3
Experience with family drug courts in three cities.三个城市的家庭毒品法庭经验。
Subst Abus. 2004 Dec;25(4):17-25. doi: 10.1300/j465v25n04_03.
4
The role of placement experiences in mediating the criminal consequences of early childhood victimization.安置经历在调节儿童早期受害的刑事后果中的作用。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1991 Apr;61(2):195-209. doi: 10.1037/h0079252.
5
Placement into foster care and the interplay of urbanicity, child behavior problems, and poverty.进入寄养家庭以及城市化、儿童行为问题和贫困之间的相互作用。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;76(3):358-66. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.358.
6
Foster family care review by judicial-citizen panels: an evaluation.由司法公民小组进行的寄养家庭照料审查:一项评估
Child Welfare. 1986 May-Jun;65(3):211-30.
7
Policy and practice for response to foster families when child abuse or neglect is reported.当报告发生虐待或忽视儿童情况时,针对寄养家庭的应对政策与实践。
Child Welfare. 1992 Nov-Dec;71(6):497-509.
8
Placement outcomes of 206 severely maltreated children in the Boston Juvenile Court system: a 7.5-year follow-up study.波士顿少年法庭系统中206名受严重虐待儿童的安置结果:一项7.5年的随访研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 1995 Sep;19(9):1051-64. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00067-i.
9
How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes?家庭药物治疗法庭的参与如何影响儿童福利结果?
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Oct;38(10):1659-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
10
Safety and stability for foster children: the policy context.寄养儿童的安全与稳定:政策背景。
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):48-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to reduce harms related to drug use among people who experience incarceration: systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以减少监禁人群中与药物使用相关的危害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Sep;9(9):e684-e699. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00160-9.
2
Criminal problem-solving and civil dependency court policies regarding medications for opioid use disorder.刑事问题解决和民事依赖法庭政策中有关阿片类药物使用障碍的药物治疗。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):425-432. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1944958. Epub 2021 Jul 8.