Shanghai Research Center for Acupuncture and Meridians, Shanghai 201203, China ; Gongli Hospital, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200135, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:804397. doi: 10.1155/2013/804397. Epub 2013 May 12.
Electroacupuncture (EA) has been shown to increase cerebral blood flow (CBF) and reduce ischemic infarction in the rat model of cerebral ischemia (middle cerebral artery occlusion, MCAO). Since multiple acupoints are recommended to treat cerebral ischemia, we performed this study to investigate if there is any variation in EA protection against cerebral ischemia with the stimulation of certain "acupoints" in rats. One hour of right MCAO with an 85% reduction of blood flow induced an extensive infarction (32.9% ± 3.8% of the brain), serious neurological deficits (scale = 6.0 ± 0.5, on a scale of 0-7), and a 17% (10 out of 60) mortality. EA, with a sparse-dense wave (5 Hz/20 Hz) at 1.0 mA for 30 minutes, at Du 20 and Du 26 greatly reduced the infarction to 4.5% ± 1.5% (P < 0.01), significantly improved neurological deficit (scale = 1.0 ± 0.5, P < 0.01), and decreased the death rate to 7% (2 out of 30, P < 0.01). Similarly, EA at left LI 11 & PC 6 reduced the infarct volume to 8.6% ± 3.8% (P < 0.01), improved the neurological deficit (scale = 2.0 ± 1.0, P < 0.01), and decreased the death rate to 8% (2 out of 24, P < 0.01). In sharp contrast, EA at right LI 11 & PC 6 did not lead to any significant changes in the infarct volume (33.4% ± 6.3%), neurological deficit (scale = 6.5 ± 0.5), and the death rate (20%, 5 out of 24). EA at left GB 34 & SP 6, also had an inconspicuous effect on the ischemic injury. EA at Du 20 & Du 26 or at left LI 11 & PC 6 instantaneously induced a significant increase in cerebral blood flow. Neither EA at right LI 11 & PC 6 nor at GB 34 & SP 6 increased cerebral blood flow. These results revealed that the EA protection against cerebral ischemia is relatively acupoint specific.
电针 (EA) 已被证明可以增加脑血流 (CBF) 并减少大鼠脑缺血模型中的缺血性梗死。由于建议使用多个穴位来治疗脑缺血,因此我们进行了这项研究,以调查在大鼠中刺激某些“穴位”时,EA 对脑缺血的保护是否存在任何变化。MCAO 后 1 小时,血流量减少 85%,导致广泛的梗死 (大脑的 32.9%±3.8%)、严重的神经功能缺损 (评分=6.0±0.5,0-7 分) 和 17% (60 例中有 10 例) 的死亡率。EA 以稀疏-密集波 (5 Hz/20 Hz) 刺激 1.0 mA 30 分钟,在 Du 20 和 Du 26 时,梗死面积大大减少至 4.5%±1.5% (P<0.01),神经功能缺损明显改善 (评分=1.0±0.5,P<0.01),死亡率降低至 7% (30 例中有 2 例,P<0.01)。同样,在左侧 LI 11 和 PC 6 进行 EA 治疗也可将梗死体积减少至 8.6%±3.8% (P<0.01),改善神经功能缺损 (评分=2.0±1.0,P<0.01),降低死亡率至 8% (24 例中有 2 例,P<0.01)。相比之下,在右侧 LI 11 和 PC 6 进行 EA 治疗并没有导致梗死体积 (33.4%±6.3%)、神经功能缺损 (评分=6.5±0.5) 和死亡率 (20%,24 例中有 5 例) 的任何显著变化。在左侧 GB 34 和 SP 6 进行 EA 治疗也对缺血损伤没有明显影响。在 Du 20 和 Du 26 或左侧 LI 11 和 PC 6 进行 EA 治疗会立即引起脑血流的显著增加。右侧 LI 11 和 PC 6 或 GB 34 和 SP 6 进行的 EA 治疗均未增加脑血流。这些结果表明,EA 对脑缺血的保护作用具有相对的穴位特异性。